07-19-2021, 12:27 PM
(07-19-2021, 09:10 AM)pat19989 Wrote:(07-18-2021, 09:38 AM)Dtris Wrote: There is plenty of evidence that all planets in the solar system have been experiencing increased energy instreaming over the last several decades. The most recent publicized examples are changes in a storm on Jupiter, the pentagon in the poles or Uranus, and auroras on other planets and moons.
"Global Warming" and "Climate Change" are terms used by propagandists on earth to push programs such as carbon taxes and carbon credits. This agenda has used money to push climate science into a pit of scientism and corporate bootlicking.
Luckily there are more researchers than ever doing good research and challenging the profit driven climate change hysteria. The best source of good daily space and weather news is Suspicious Observers on Youtube or their website.
Hurricane season is growing more and more volatile. Wildfires are burning more than ever. These are meteorological facts, unless you do not trust the data from United States Geological Survey. Mississippi recently had two 200-year rain events on two consecutive days. 14 inches of rain total. Unheard of in the United States if not caused by tropical storm. .
Have you ever thought that the climate IS changing, but some organizations are now using it as an opportunity to gain money/control? Given that governments and elites seek nothing but further control of the general population, doesn't resource scarcity sound like a good means of control? If climate change is real, I don't think the government would do much of anything about it. And what have they done about it so far? Nothing. To me, that is a strong piece of supporting evidence
We didn't have a major hurricane for almost a decade. There is no evidence of more extreme climate events now compared to historical data (recently published study just confirmed this I just spent 20 minutes looking for the link, will look more later). The drought in California is not as bad as the 1959 drought, and it has been known for 100s of years the California gets cyclical droughts. The wildfires are caused by environmentalists campaigning to prevent controlled burns and removal of deadwood from the forests combined with normal lightning strikes and a high population of idiots that think setting of fireworks in a drought in the forest is a good idea. The arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing just fine and polar bear population is at a 30 year high. The climate was supposed to kill us in 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020 and not only are we still here, not much has changed except now it is by 2030.
I have been following this stuff for 20 years now and going back and forth over time. The evidence is overwhelming at this point that the mainstream narrative about human caused climate change is grossly overblown. While there are over 1000 peer reviewed papers showing flaws and problems with the standard model. Climategate proved that people are willing to lie for their agenda. More and more research is pointing to the sun and space weather being the primary driver of the earth's climate. Meanwhile the media and the IPCC keep pushing the man caused narrative in order to push their tax and other plans forward. Despite the newest CMIP 6 model not being accurate enough to model past weather.
The very gas you exhale and green plants breathe is demonized as a pollutant while the earth sits at 400 ppm, geohistorical lows. Meanwhile plants die at under 280 ppm, and thrive at 1200. The solutions make no sense, like letting China and India pollute as much as they want under the Paris Accords while Europe and USA must cripple their countries. Ignoring the fact that USA and Europe have decreased net emissions over the last 20 years without any agreements while China alone increased emissions enough to offset both.
I would rather not get into a drawn out discussion of this here as it is not really pertinent to this forum. But examining why the narrative of those in power is always one which labels the people as the problem is perhaps a good idea to explore before accepting any ideas pushed by those in power.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/...21GL092983 Minimum 400 years of climate data needed to determine carbon sensitivity. CMIP6 uses 150 years.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...21-05872-z A study showing correlation with global climate oscillation and the 11 year solar cycle.
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-preci...aps-select Maps showing global temperature, despite reports of hottest june on record we are below the 30 year average.