Are you going to take the vaccine?

[Margan]

Ada, this has been covered before but I will gladly tell you again in case you missed it.
there are people who are for this vaccine and those who are against ist.

Pro - Those for use mostly mainstream source, tv and news media for their decision, there are doctors, virologists and also big pharma among them.

Contra -Those against it, there have also been studies conducted and there are doctors and also virologists speaking out against it. Even one nobel prize winner and the inventor of the MrNA technique Dr Robert Malone among them. Can you simply dismiss those highly educated people as "misinformed bullshitters".
Plus those are for the most part NOT affiliated with pharma.

Are you saying that those scientists and doctors who have made their studies and come to different conclusions than the official narrative, news media and big pharma suggests - that they must all be wrong and lying?
Do you have the medical expertise to judge any of those claims or is it just a gut feeling  "it is on TV and in the news non-stop that we need to get vaxxed so it must be true- and BIden said it as well" (and as we know politicians always have our best at heart don't they - and since we live in a democracy they are surely not being bribed or corrupted )
And lastly, since you claim anti-this vacc is all misinformation and potentially dangerous, what do you suggest? is it censorship you suggest?
because it is always only one side suggesting this - and you know which.
But to make an informed decision one needs to have all the information available right?
the pros and the cons?
so why should this then be a problem to have different views and studies out there?
On this thread there are different views as well, some people provide links supporting the pro and others the contra.
do you think people are so dumb that we have to present them the solution on a silver platter and the opinions and studies made by people who come to another conclusion have to be destroyed?