08-04-2021, 11:13 AM
When the data is not cherry picked, the protectiveness becomes obvious.
But yes it is a choice I am making to trust the data. I guess we could say that I assume the scientific process is working against STS. It is making it harder for them to really hide things. Still doable, but it's open to scrutiny by its very design.
A bit like open source software being more secure because all can check the code, but it is still possible to "hide" security issues in there.
The guidelines says this: "Please do not offer unsolicited diagnoses, assertions about cures, or assessments of others through a healing modality that has not been explicitly chosen by them."
So while I am advocating for the safety and efficacy of Covid vaccination in general, purely based on risk assessment. I am certainly not advocating for anyone in particular to get vaccinated. A personal risk assessment can come to a different conclusion than the general one.
As an aside, drinking city water can have adverse effects. It is a question of risk assessment.
But yes it is a choice I am making to trust the data. I guess we could say that I assume the scientific process is working against STS. It is making it harder for them to really hide things. Still doable, but it's open to scrutiny by its very design.
A bit like open source software being more secure because all can check the code, but it is still possible to "hide" security issues in there.
The guidelines says this: "Please do not offer unsolicited diagnoses, assertions about cures, or assessments of others through a healing modality that has not been explicitly chosen by them."
So while I am advocating for the safety and efficacy of Covid vaccination in general, purely based on risk assessment. I am certainly not advocating for anyone in particular to get vaccinated. A personal risk assessment can come to a different conclusion than the general one.
As an aside, drinking city water can have adverse effects. It is a question of risk assessment.