"The Conspirations circles in particular have been completely hijacked by STS to promote stuff like pure Free Markets and demonize any forms of socialism."
That is one way to raise one's consciousness. Being aware of negative realms is a higher state just like being aware of positive realms. 4th Density negative exists, so does 5th and 6th negative.
The power one gains in Divinity is equivalent more or less.
So while you say awareness is good, the actual methods human use for raising awareness, you discard yet have nothing better in terms of practical methods.
" All proper testing so far has failed in disproving that we are in a post-scarcity society. "
Scientific methods do not attempt to disprove something. They attempt to gain data to prove a theory or hypothesis. If the data contradicts the hypothesis enough, and a better one is available, then the current hypothesis is discarded in favor of the better one. But both are not "proven" nor "disproven" yet. They are just useful, not absolutely true.
So scientists would not care that you say x has failed in disproving. They want the actual proof of evidence backing up your post scarcity hypothesis. They want something concrete, not theoretical or make believe.
As for spreading the word, humans have free will. They can choose "not to know". So no matter how many times you attempt to share the info, if they block you 30 times, you are just depolarizing in attempting to "raise awareness" further.
That is one way to raise one's consciousness. Being aware of negative realms is a higher state just like being aware of positive realms. 4th Density negative exists, so does 5th and 6th negative.
The power one gains in Divinity is equivalent more or less.
So while you say awareness is good, the actual methods human use for raising awareness, you discard yet have nothing better in terms of practical methods.
" All proper testing so far has failed in disproving that we are in a post-scarcity society. "
Scientific methods do not attempt to disprove something. They attempt to gain data to prove a theory or hypothesis. If the data contradicts the hypothesis enough, and a better one is available, then the current hypothesis is discarded in favor of the better one. But both are not "proven" nor "disproven" yet. They are just useful, not absolutely true.
So scientists would not care that you say x has failed in disproving. They want the actual proof of evidence backing up your post scarcity hypothesis. They want something concrete, not theoretical or make believe.
As for spreading the word, humans have free will. They can choose "not to know". So no matter how many times you attempt to share the info, if they block you 30 times, you are just depolarizing in attempting to "raise awareness" further.