01-13-2021, 01:56 PM
(01-13-2021, 01:17 PM)zedro Wrote: Just because you don't trust taking a particular experimental vaccine that has inherent risks that may outweight the actual risk you may have from the virus itself, does not make you an 'anti-vaxxer'...
I agree fully with you on this. This is not what I consider to be part of the anti-vaxxers movement. I am talking about the movement in the light of correlations with spiritual seeking as Ada mentioned.
This link is more in line with my understanding: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/anti-vaxxer
Quote:...Anti-vaxxers are people who believe that vaccines are unsafe and infringe on their human rights. They typically deny the existence or validity of the science supporting their use in the general population...
(01-13-2021, 01:17 PM)zedro Wrote: ...in fact there is more actual science that casts doubt on these particular vaccines and covid social/medical policies in general...
With this I disagree. It takes a lot of work to research all of this by ourselves. So instead we take it on faith that the vaccine is safe or is not. This is what I am saying. And for myself, it is not what comes to light from looking at the studies done in context. What I find is that the evidence strongly supports using vaccines for the benefits far outweighs the complications.
In my opinion, we sadly cannot get a good picture for ourselves by reading the material provided either by those in favor or not in favor of vaccines. The homework has to be done from scratch by going at the source for all of it. Which of course is not practical because most of the info is paywalled (which is the sort of thing I wish we would collectively focus on fixing).