07-11-2012, 11:59 AM
I dont understand your notion that I don't like you, have disdain for you.
I don't know you, and in so have a neutral opinion of you.
The Law of One forums was the last place I thought I'd find someone crawling threads, picking forum fights.
I told you I was kidding, poking at you, saying 'I win'.
What a place full of prickly people... See ya.
I don't know you, and in so have a neutral opinion of you.
The Law of One forums was the last place I thought I'd find someone crawling threads, picking forum fights.
I told you I was kidding, poking at you, saying 'I win'.
What a place full of prickly people... See ya.
(07-11-2012, 11:54 AM)ShinAr Wrote:(07-11-2012, 10:54 AM)kdsii Wrote: True, it can be hard to read when I'm just poking at you.
But a message between two members exclusively is a PM, or 'personal message', wouldn't you agree?
I don't recall becoming reluctant, just disagreeing with the nature of the higer self, remember? It was also a trivial topic anyway, not deserving of ruffled feathers.
And of course when I say <--BOOM to a quote that backs my previous statement, I'm not alpha-male-ing you, just teasing with 'I win'.
Typically when you ask a question with a definite answer in an open forum, you can expect an open variety of responses.
Lighten up!
(07-11-2012, 10:47 AM)ShinAr Wrote:(07-11-2012, 09:44 AM)kdsii Wrote: This is correct.
actually my question was addressed to azrael. I don't know if you think my question was in response to something that you had said or not. So I am uncertain of the correlation.
If per chance you are simply agreeing with what was said between AZ and I, then we shall both have to wait for his actual reply to see if he confirms how I have interpreted his words.
I have other questions to ask you with regard to this discussion but it seems that you became 'reluctant' in your earlier response so I am unsure of your desire to continue our topic.
It is difficult to read emotion and sarcasm in these forums. One must be very clear with such things so they are not misinterpreted. try to be more specific and please use your quotes from the post you are responding to in the beginning of your post so we can tell what you are responding to from your first remark. This will be extremely helpful for those of us who are easily confused, even if I am the only moron in here, lol.
Lighten up again?
Okay I get your message and have to form my own opinion of you as you have noted.
I really am just trying to offer you advice as we have all seen this time and again in these forums. maybe you know this , maybe you don't. But advice was meant in a friendly manner just in case you were not aware of the problems of saying things like 'lighten up' to someone in a post.
So this is you, this is me, and we will be we.
There are some here who avoid me because they choose to dislike me because of the interactions here in the forum, as though they know me personally and have disdain for me as a person. Those also apply the same type of responding that you do.
I guess I am just of the mind that if all it takes is a little diplomacy to avoid such things, then why not be diplomatic instead. Is it really necessary to choose to dislike a person that you have never met and know only based upon their speculations on creation?
How about if you try to avoid taking my thoughts and speculations so heavily, and maybe you won't see the need to tell me to lighten up. And in the meantime I will try to tolerate and diplomatically evade any further evaluation from you.
I have no reason to dislike you, regardless of your forum interaction. And I choose to love you despite what might be your imperfections. But I also choose to point out what I think is mutually beneficial to state.
I'll see you out there, in here, lol.