07-13-2022, 04:42 PM
I'll bullet point my thoughts here:
I would largely agree with the statements that have further agreed my original statements that Christians are kind of closed minded though. A lot of the most inspiring texts exist completely outside their religion, and this tendency further expresses a complete lack of understanding of the Law of Free Will. The law of free will is not just an irritating rule that is sometimes broken and produces karma. It has a positive function.
But an organisation doesn't have to be one hundred percent positive to be useful. It just has to be 'positive enough' to start mopping up this sewer of a society. My local church has a program where they take people that are homeless and get them back on their feet. In general, when dealing with the difficult elements of our society and I am not referring to negative but the 'broken' among us, the semi controlling aspect of the church may be necessary.
One of the drawbacks for instance of the welfare state is that 1) The money is given absolutely without condition. 2) The money is given without emotional support. The second point here I think is highly relevant to human psychology. To jump to an atheist paradigm, if we were living in a tribal world, the resources we are given don't necessarily reduce our anxiety. The loyalty of other people loving us is what reduces anxiety because it tells us we are safe in this world. And on the first point, you can theoretically enable people to drink themselves to death if you give resources absolutely without strings.
In general I think the model of the church is highly positive in this, the cultural ability to sift through those that are actually trying to improve themselves and those that are abusing the victim status to indulge the "sins of the flesh". Perhaps in the absence of private charities that could also do this work, I think this is integral to a functioning society.
Also, as it relates to the main outlook of the Law of One. There really isn't very many places we can go to affirm the majesty of the "One Infinite Creator". I have dropped a piece of music down here that aligns with that sense of love for the Creative Forces:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bQY2komrnA
- That Muhammed was 6D was not in the Law of One, Straight lie. It was not in the Q'uo section you quoted either.
- That anyone, even a 6D entity, is "beyond morality" is straight out of a negative teaching. David Wilcock has talked a bit about that being the beliefs of the deep state, it is also talked about through hollywood films such as the Sith teachings in 'Star Wars episode III revenge of the Sith'.
- While I do not disregard certain other spiritual teachings for their positivity - and at another time there are certain Hindu teachings that are very interesting. To state that Carla's Christianity was just some sort of accidental by product that the Law of One contact adapted to is... well just senseless. The contact was chosen deliberately. The Law of One contact carefully managed Christianity into being by creating the pyramids. And the only other unconscious channeling of a similar accuracy was the Edgar Cayce readings which also chose a Christian contact. It seems silly that this very obvious choice was not chosen to align with what they wanted to say!
I would largely agree with the statements that have further agreed my original statements that Christians are kind of closed minded though. A lot of the most inspiring texts exist completely outside their religion, and this tendency further expresses a complete lack of understanding of the Law of Free Will. The law of free will is not just an irritating rule that is sometimes broken and produces karma. It has a positive function.
But an organisation doesn't have to be one hundred percent positive to be useful. It just has to be 'positive enough' to start mopping up this sewer of a society. My local church has a program where they take people that are homeless and get them back on their feet. In general, when dealing with the difficult elements of our society and I am not referring to negative but the 'broken' among us, the semi controlling aspect of the church may be necessary.
One of the drawbacks for instance of the welfare state is that 1) The money is given absolutely without condition. 2) The money is given without emotional support. The second point here I think is highly relevant to human psychology. To jump to an atheist paradigm, if we were living in a tribal world, the resources we are given don't necessarily reduce our anxiety. The loyalty of other people loving us is what reduces anxiety because it tells us we are safe in this world. And on the first point, you can theoretically enable people to drink themselves to death if you give resources absolutely without strings.
In general I think the model of the church is highly positive in this, the cultural ability to sift through those that are actually trying to improve themselves and those that are abusing the victim status to indulge the "sins of the flesh". Perhaps in the absence of private charities that could also do this work, I think this is integral to a functioning society.
Also, as it relates to the main outlook of the Law of One. There really isn't very many places we can go to affirm the majesty of the "One Infinite Creator". I have dropped a piece of music down here that aligns with that sense of love for the Creative Forces:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bQY2komrnA