08-13-2021, 03:58 PM
(08-13-2021, 01:50 PM)the Wrote: I recently posted a video, indicating NAC can reduce C19 vaccine impact, and how it reduces the C19 impact, but was removed by admin team, saying that's commercial. :-) probably based on that standard, all posts related with HCQ should also be banned, since they're also commercial.
so now I am posting another article related with NAC. NAC has been in market for half a century, since 1963. now after there're news that it can reduce C19 vaccine side impact, it's banned by FDA.
https://naturalmedicines.therapeuticrese...-both.aspx
similar to HCQ etc, all those old medicine, as soon as there're articles that they can treat C19 or C19 vaccine, they're banned.
(08-13-2021, 01:50 PM)Patrick Wrote: Well there is a great deal of the alternative media/market that is just there to exploit people and make money in ways that are much more unscrupulous than what we call big pharma.
So that is something to keep in mind my in my opinion.
in my opinion, it's true that people/organization will try to marketing something, but in the NAC case, the original deleted admin video might not be categorized as marketing. NAC is a very similar case to HCQ, a very old supplemental/medicine, has been in market since 1963. not expensive as all. in Canada, it will be 10 to 30 dollars a bottle, if buy from offshore, it might be dirty cheap, since its so old, and there're no patent associated with it, so not too much profit.
it's been in market for over half a century, not much complain, and this year, as soon as ther're 'rumor'it can treat C19 vaccine side effect, it's banned by FDA.
i don't believe coincidence, so for those want to investigate mitigating vaccine impact, they should look into NAC. I can't say it will work for sure, but definite worth some investigation.