What's the difference between planetary 3rd density heating and global warming?

[Dtris]

I agree that this is not the place for a drawn out discussion. I considered reporting my initial responses to get them taken down because of their trivial nature. I will say though that the noaa link you included shows an increase in land temperature in the grand majority of USA, Canada, Europe, and Asia...?

I agree that the mainstream narrative may be overblown, but I feel it is more important to focus on the fact that our current fossil-fuel dependent, import-dependent, mass production, factory farming food model around the world is extremely outdated and in no way sustainable in the long run. I feel like we can all agree that our relationship to our food and energy must change for one reason or another.

I'm sorry to be caught up in these relatively trivial affairs

Nothing to apologize about. The importance of this information and the view a person takes is variable IMO.

I see the push to blame humans for climate change as a STS narrative pushed by the wannabe overlords to be used as a means of enslaving humanity willingly. You can only willingly give up your freedom. Some will do it for security, others for the animals, and others for a CO2 fueled warming trend.

In the long run the actual information is less important than how you relate to it. Does it cause you fear, anxiety and worry? If it does is this due to a provable, immediately eminent threat? Or is it nebulous, far down the road, and socially divisive? Does the belief empower you as an individual or does it make you believe you are the problem?

Based on my research and own intuition, I choose to believe that the earth is a much more robust, stong, and capable entity than given credit for in the mainstream climate narrative. It would take much more CO2 to throw things out of balance than what we produce. In general the effects we will have will be erased in the geological march of time and virtually undetectable in a million years. Could we cause serious damage? Sure, but CO2 isn't going to be why. Maybe a full out nuclear war, but even that was something that the Confederation prepared for and implied that it would not be enough to cause planetary extinction.

Does that mean we should just pollute and destroy willy nilly? Of course not. We are supposed to love and care for the earth, not abuse her. I just don't believe that a little but more of the air needed by plants to breathe is a pollutant and going to kill the planet, the earth is much too intelligent for that.

Now what this does is introduce a problem for myself in regards to the LOO. If Ra and Quo and company have said that the planet is warming and it is due to planetary disharmony, then you may think I am denying that the planet has warmed. That is not the case. The Earth was warming during the 80s, just as it cooled during the 60s, back when they said global cooling was caused by man and the only answer was to tax people. I find the possibility that disharmony caused the heating to be interesting and a possibility that should be explored.

When this is paired with the planetary changes though it brings about an interesting concept that the cause of the climate change we have witnessed over the last century may largely be due to the shift into 4th density space. The energetic effects of the higher density space manifest differently on each planet but the end result is one which the potential energy is higher, in the case of earth this may be manifesting as higher latent heat due to the disharmony, whereas if the harmony was greater this energy may have been expressed in other ways.