04-23-2021, 09:11 PM
(04-23-2021, 07:30 AM)jafar Wrote: Both STS and STO is based on the conception of separation in mind.
When there's no separation, there is no "others" as such that there is no "self" either.
Yes, I believe you are correct. The Law of One uses the Law of Confusion, so terms used such as STS and STO need to be interpreted correctly. It's similar I believe to how the Bible uses Law of Confusion language to avoid revealing truths prematurely, such as:
Quote:"To the one who is victorious and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations—that one ‘will rule them with an iron scepter and will dash them to pieces like pottery’—just as I have received authority from my Father. I will also give that one the morning star. Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches." - Revelation 2:26-29
The passage "whoever has ears" to me indicates a reference to that Law of Confusion language is used. And the "victorious one" I believe is the social memory complex forming on earth and not an individual king or dictator. And the text about giving the morning star to the victorious one I assume is a description of how the social memory on Venus (hi Ra!) will join with the social memory complex on earth. And dashing the nations like pottery is I think a reference to a peaceful process of replacing the need for nations.
In the Matrix movie Neo is "the one", but who isn't the one? So even in the Matrix movies the Law of Confusion is used. And the Sith in Star Wars are service to self (STS), they only care about themselves. And the Jedi are service to others (STO) and only care about others. Neither the Jedi nor the Sith have the balance of the Force.