03-27-2021, 12:52 PM
I think any "scientific" theories we have are very far from the complexity of this existence, especially considering dimensions beyond 3D. I put "scientific" in quotation marks because I do not consider flat-earth or the latest simulation theories scientific.
The one theory that I find the most compelling is String Theory (and M Theory) and I have for a long time. Quantum physics is just a way to observe subatomic phenomena, and studying things such as twin particles which may indicate that things are connected beyond our visible reality is great food for thought.
One could read Flatland, and then study a tesseract, and derive all sorts of theories from that alone.
I stay open to new information rather than fixating on any particular view, though some views may resonate. Nonetheless, it is fascinating to explore the nature of this existence via theoretical cosmology and I love doing it. But I also think that sticking only to science is a narrow viewpoint. For example, the archetypes as laid out by Ra are, according to Ra, a blueprint for the structure of this reality. With the somewhat primitive drawings on the images, they don't seem to be scientific, but that is not a good reason to not consider their importance. Just as ancient indigenous peoples knew things about the cosmos and star systems etc., and to exclude such things would be limiting in an overall view which may yield observations not necessarily of a material nature.
So a Theory of Everything, which Einstein chased for most of his adult life, at the point we are now, and under a veil, may steer one toward a groove or box to put everything into. But following resonances is more effective in my opinion, and a lot of fun, with the understanding that one will never "know," at least in this life as we experience it here, the full extent of infinite reality. All one has to do is ask one's self one question to get the craziness of figuring it out: Where is all of this? The problem with the question is obvious, and people will have pat or looped answers that really say nothing at all.
I love the mystery. Without it, we wouldn't have such fun exploring reality. I do feel though, as I said above, that String Theory is on the right track. But I may change my mind at any moment.
The one theory that I find the most compelling is String Theory (and M Theory) and I have for a long time. Quantum physics is just a way to observe subatomic phenomena, and studying things such as twin particles which may indicate that things are connected beyond our visible reality is great food for thought.
One could read Flatland, and then study a tesseract, and derive all sorts of theories from that alone.
I stay open to new information rather than fixating on any particular view, though some views may resonate. Nonetheless, it is fascinating to explore the nature of this existence via theoretical cosmology and I love doing it. But I also think that sticking only to science is a narrow viewpoint. For example, the archetypes as laid out by Ra are, according to Ra, a blueprint for the structure of this reality. With the somewhat primitive drawings on the images, they don't seem to be scientific, but that is not a good reason to not consider their importance. Just as ancient indigenous peoples knew things about the cosmos and star systems etc., and to exclude such things would be limiting in an overall view which may yield observations not necessarily of a material nature.
So a Theory of Everything, which Einstein chased for most of his adult life, at the point we are now, and under a veil, may steer one toward a groove or box to put everything into. But following resonances is more effective in my opinion, and a lot of fun, with the understanding that one will never "know," at least in this life as we experience it here, the full extent of infinite reality. All one has to do is ask one's self one question to get the craziness of figuring it out: Where is all of this? The problem with the question is obvious, and people will have pat or looped answers that really say nothing at all.
I love the mystery. Without it, we wouldn't have such fun exploring reality. I do feel though, as I said above, that String Theory is on the right track. But I may change my mind at any moment.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)