Bring4th
A Purely Scientific Thread? - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Science & Technology (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: A Purely Scientific Thread? (/showthread.php?tid=19023)



A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ming the Merciful - 03-25-2021

Do you have any, (potential), theories regarding anything Scientific? Physics, Quantum Physics, String Theory, Cosmology, and the list is endless. There are as many theories about the "State of Existence" as there are people? All theories, (and potential theories), accepted, no matter what your thesis is. Is the Earth flat? Are we living in a Simulation? Come forth and Enlighten us?


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - STAR-ONE - 03-27-2021

(03-25-2021, 04:03 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: Do you have any, (potential), theories regarding anything Scientific? Physics, Quantum Physics, String Theory, Cosmology, and the list is endless. There are as many theories about the "State of Existence" as there are people? All theories, (and potential theories), accepted, no matter what your thesis is. Is the Earth flat? Are we living in a Simulation? Come forth and Enlighten us?

Interesting subject

Gematria : http://thecodeofhumanity.fr/ To supposedly get out of the simulation by understanding numbers (old Jewish method)

If you type in Jesus, Lucifer, Zeus, Hades, Amon Ra, Muhammad, and most other gods and famous people, it kind of looks like a basic sync? 333, 666, 999, 303..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does the Large Particle Collider (LHC) secretly produce Heavy Quarks in order to craft a weapon capable of annihilating a planet?

https://cerntruth.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/119-terrorists-will-start-production-of-strangelets-irony-or-destiny/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_8yK2kmxoo


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ming the Merciful - 03-27-2021

(03-27-2021, 11:11 AM)STAR-ONE Wrote:
(03-25-2021, 04:03 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: Do you have any, (potential), theories regarding anything Scientific? Physics, Quantum Physics, String Theory, Cosmology, and the list is endless. There are as many theories about the "State of Existence" as there are people? All theories, (and potential theories), accepted, no matter what your thesis is. Is the Earth flat? Are we living in a Simulation? Come forth and Enlighten us?

Interesting subject

Gematria : http://thecodeofhumanity.fr/ To supposedly get out of the simulation by understanding numbers (old Jewish method)

If you type in Jesus, Lucifer, Zeus, Hades, Amon Ra, Muhammad, and most other gods and famous people, it kind of looks like a basic sync? 333, 666, 999, 303..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does the Large Particle Collider (LHC) secretly produce Heavy Quarks in order to craft a weapon capable of annihilating a planet?

https://cerntruth.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/119-terrorists-will-start-production-of-strangelets-irony-or-destiny/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_8yK2kmxoo

Thank you Star-One, I will look into that. Although I am coming in front a different route, (Eastern Mysticism), as my Spiritual Awareness developed, I have noticed so many parallels in all Religions. Although the separate Religions deny anything to do with each other, the core beliefs are so closely related. Hinduism and Islam are opposites, the underlying essence is so closely related, (hence), why Sufism and Sikhism developed, and the "Middle Path" between the two extremes. Uniting all three aspects.


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Diana - 03-27-2021

I think any "scientific" theories we have are very far from the complexity of this existence, especially considering dimensions beyond 3D. I put "scientific" in quotation marks because I do not consider flat-earth or the latest simulation theories scientific. 

The one theory that I find the most compelling is String Theory (and M Theory) and I have for a long time. Quantum physics is just a way to observe subatomic phenomena, and studying things such as twin particles which may indicate that things are connected beyond our visible reality is great food for thought. 

One could read Flatland, and then study a tesseract, and derive all sorts of theories from that alone.

I stay open to new information rather than fixating on any particular view, though some views may resonate. Nonetheless, it is fascinating to explore the nature of this existence via theoretical cosmology and I love doing it. But I also think that sticking only to science is a narrow viewpoint. For example, the archetypes as laid out by Ra are, according to Ra, a blueprint for the structure of this reality. With the somewhat primitive drawings on the images, they don't seem to be scientific, but that is not a good reason to not consider their importance. Just as ancient indigenous peoples knew things about the cosmos and star systems etc., and to exclude such things would be limiting in an overall view which may yield observations not necessarily of a material nature.

So a Theory of Everything, which Einstein chased for most of his adult life, at the point we are now, and under a veil, may steer one toward a groove or box to put everything into. But following resonances is more effective in my opinion, and a lot of fun, with the understanding that one will never "know," at least in this life as we experience it here, the full extent of infinite reality. All one has to do is ask one's self one question to get the craziness of figuring it out: Where is all of this? The problem with the question is obvious, and people will have pat or looped answers that really say nothing at all. 

I love the mystery. Without it, we wouldn't have such fun exploring reality. I do feel though, as I said above, that String Theory is on the right track. But I may change my mind at any moment. Tongue


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ymarsakar - 03-27-2021

Earth is a type of flat land and tesseract. Whomever made that prank is going to enjoy watching humanity figure out the egg.


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - STAR-ONE - 03-27-2021

(03-27-2021, 02:33 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote: Earth is a type of flat land and tesseract. Whomever made that prank is going to enjoy watching humanity figure out the egg.


Would have this shape ?

https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/08/yggdrasil-and-the-9-norse-worlds/121244


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ming the Merciful - 03-27-2021

(03-27-2021, 12:52 PM)Diana Wrote: I think any "scientific" theories we have are very far from the complexity of this existence, especially considering dimensions beyond 3D. I put "scientific" in quotation marks because I do not consider flat-earth or the latest simulation theories scientific. 

The one theory that I find the most compelling is String Theory (and M Theory) and I have for a long time. Quantum physics is just a way to observe subatomic phenomena, and studying things such as twin particles which may indicate that things are connected beyond our visible reality is great food for thought. 

One could read Flatland, and then study a tesseract, and derive all sorts of theories from that alone.

I stay open to new information rather than fixating on any particular view, though some views may resonate. Nonetheless, it is fascinating to explore the nature of this existence via theoretical cosmology and I love doing it. But I also think that sticking only to science is a narrow viewpoint. For example, the archetypes as laid out by Ra are, according to Ra, a blueprint for the structure of this reality. With the somewhat primitive drawings on the images, they don't seem to be scientific, but that is not a good reason to not consider their importance. Just as ancient indigenous peoples knew things about the cosmos and star systems etc., and to exclude such things would be limiting in an overall view which may yield observations not necessarily of a material nature.

So a Theory of Everything, which Einstein chased for most of his adult life, at the point we are now, and under a veil, may steer one toward a groove or box to put everything into. But following resonances is more effective in my opinion, and a lot of fun, with the understanding that one will never "know," at least in this life as we experience it here, the full extent of infinite reality. All one has to do is ask one's self one question to get the craziness of figuring it out: Where is all of this? The problem with the question is obvious, and people will have pat or looped answers that really say nothing at all. 

I love the mystery. Without it, we wouldn't have such fun exploring reality. I do feel though, as I said above, that String Theory is on the right track. But I may change my mind at any moment. Tongue

Hi Diana, we are both speaking the same language. I loved the concept of Quantum Physics and String Theory from the first time I discovered them. Have you seen my thesis on "Dark Matter & Dark Energy"? It is here, (somewhere). It is lost in the Void of the "Virtual World". Or, I lost it in another Post, (something Scientific). My theory is, that as Time is not, (technically), a Dimension, and it only exists because of the Universe in motion. I actually believe that Dark Energy & Dark Matter is a "Neutral State", neither Energy or Matter, and it resides in the "Fourth Dimension", and that is why Scientists cannot find it. Dark Matter & Dark Energy is also the "Binding Force" that is what is holding the Universe together, and stopping the Universe from expanding too quickly. Also, "String Theory" is entwined in the Fourth Dimension, (again), why Scientists cannot find it. Anyway, that is my thesis. Does anyone have any comments on my thesis? :idea:


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - sillypumpkins - 03-27-2021

I just told Patrick about this but the Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot is an excellent and engaging book about quantum physics and the holograph theory (i think thats what they called it? its been a while)


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ymarsakar - 03-27-2021

(03-27-2021, 02:58 PM)STAR-ONE Wrote:
(03-27-2021, 02:33 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote: Earth is a type of flat land and tesseract. Whomever made that prank is going to enjoy watching humanity figure out the egg.


Would have this shape ?

https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/08/yggdrasil-and-the-9-norse-worlds/121244

Close.

Each world is not a planet but a plane or sub density or astral dream world.

Inner plane is a term used by confederation


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - STAR-ONE - 03-28-2021

(03-27-2021, 09:06 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote:
(03-27-2021, 02:58 PM)STAR-ONE Wrote:
(03-27-2021, 02:33 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote: Earth is a type of flat land and tesseract. Whomever made that prank is going to enjoy watching humanity figure out the egg.


Would have this shape ?

https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/08/yggdrasil-and-the-9-norse-worlds/121244

Close.

Each world is not a planet but a plane or sub density or astral dream world.

Inner plane is a term used by confederation

The universe should have that egg shape you're talking about.

https://eveilhomme.com/2019/05/08/la-matrice-et-loeuf-cosmique-vu-par-un-artiste-troublant/

The Univers is a Tor. (See photos below)

https://eveilhomme.com/2021/01/30/le-document-le-plus-compromettant-que-de-la-cia-ait-jamais-declassifie-les-etudes-secretes-sur-dieu-il-elle-a-ete-decouverte/


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Patrick - 03-28-2021

(03-28-2021, 02:06 AM)STAR-ONE Wrote: ...https://eveilhomme.com/2021/01/30/le-document-le-plus-compromettant-que-de-la-cia-ait-jamais-declassifie-les-etudes-secretes-sur-dieu-il-elle-a-ete-decouverte/

Très intéressant ! Oui de plus en plus la vraie réalité devient visible pour tout le monde. Smile


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - flofrog - 03-28-2021

Patrick, subtitles please Wink

Roughly it says God is in the words of Sacred Fool, a Creathrix...


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ymarsakar - 03-28-2021

This is that great portal suppression thing. http://www.lyricus.org/about/purpose.htm


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ming the Merciful - 03-28-2021

(03-28-2021, 01:35 PM)flofrog Wrote: Patrick, subtitles please Wink

Roughly it says God is in the words of Sacred Fool, a Creathrix...

So, now we have decided that everything is an illusion, does this mean that we have to reevaluate everything? Basically, the God(s) lied to us? Now there is a point, are the God(s) lesser Spiritual Beings than the "Universal Consciousness"? And we put them on a pedestal and suddenly they have been downgraded to a place less Spiritual. The Universe is a mystery? It was a good thing I decided to follow the teachings of the Buddha, (denying the God(s)), or, finding my own Self-Realization. I hold Patrick responsible for leading me astray. The video he suggested changes everything. It is like discovering the dance of "Zorba the Greek", and a new set of Liberations appear. Just dance, and be free. Dance! Dance! Dance!

Huh


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Patrick - 03-28-2021

You cannot be led astray. All roads goes to the same place my friend. Smile

The video you refer to is in accordance with the Ra material.

Baby steps.

There must be a clear way for materialists to follow, without all the baggage that spirituality normally comes with.


RE: A Purely Scientific Thread? - Ming the Merciful - 03-28-2021

(03-28-2021, 03:42 PM)Patrick Wrote: You cannot be led astray.  All roads goes to the same place my friend. Smile

The video you refer to is in accordance with the Ra material.

Baby steps.

There must be a clear way for materialists to follow, without all the baggage that spirituality normally comes with.

Thank you Patrick my friend. There those that say, that I have a wicked sense of humour and people take me too seriously, and my sarcasm is my curse. You would not believe the number of people who are afraid of my "Sarcastic Streak". Overdramatising is a lost art. I actually agree with you. It does change the Paradigm, (literally), and perhaps we should all dance with Zorba. Better still, dance with Shiva. Anyhow, the "God(s)", they have been demoted, don't you think? I shall decline from converting to Judaism and remain on my current Path, (that will please the God(s)). For a person who does not believe in the God(s), (in the Christian sense), I seem to be always praising the God(s). That also is my burden. There I go again, becoming a "Dramatic Artist", I missed my calling in life. The point is, don't always take me too seriously.

RollEyes