The Weed Thread

[meadow-foreigner]

Thank you for sharing and giving your thoughts and feelings meadow-foreigner.

I apologize if this derails the thread, however because it seems like the main topic is discernment, and you seem to share quite a bit of philosophy from the Cassiopaean material, you do realize that they are not STO, right?

11.12 Questioner: Where are these three entities now?

Ra: I am Ra. These entities are in the dimension known to you as fourth. Therefore the space/time continua are not compatible. An approximation of the space/time locus of each would net no actual understanding. Each chose a fourth-density planet which was dedicated to the pursuit of the understanding of the Law of One through service to self, one in what you know as the Orion group, one in what you know as Cassiopeia, one in what you know as Southern Cross; however, these loci are not satisfactory. We do not have vocabulary for the geometric calculations necessary for transfer of this understanding to you.

You actually brought up an interesting piece to the discussion, which has everything to do with discernment.

First of all, you claim that the Cassiopaean are X because someone else said they were X.
The source you provide is a claim that comes from a 3D instrument, which, regardless of the narrow-band used and all that jazz, is still an imperfect instrument as you and I, with limited tools to convey certain messages.

Okay. This is part of the story.

So, why don't we take a look at what the Cassiopaeans have to say themselves when asked what "spiritual ideology", so to speak, they are? You know, to take a look into the other side of the story?

Q: (L) Where are you from?
A: Casiopaea.

Q: (L) Where is that?
A: Near Orion.

Q: (L) I heard that the Orions are the “Bad guys.” Are the Orion group bad?

Q: (L) Do you serve self or others?
A: I serve both.

Q: (L) What is your philosophy?
A: One.

Q: (T) You talk about both STO and STS. Yet you tell us that we need to learn to be STO. Why is there a difference between what we have to do and what you are doing?
A: STO is balance because you serve self through others.

There will probably be this Matthew 6:24 quote on that "[no one] (beware when the keyword "no one" is used, as it was mentioned before on this topic) can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money." So I'll anticipate it:

This is somewhat of a central aspect that's been really advertised throughout the ages as some sort of exclusivity between one servant and its master. Take into account that the original text was written in Greek.

Greece was a hierarchical society, in which those who had a certain title (such as citizens, for instance) had more privileges than others. Slavery was also cool in Greece. Now, use your discernment and think if this is a cool philosophy for you to have.

Let's take a look at the remains of the Greek version of this versicle, shall we?

Οὐδεὶς δύναται δουλεύειν δυσὶ κυρίοις ἢ μισήσει τὸν ἕνα καὶ ἀγαπήσει τὸν ἕτερον ἢ ἀνθέξεται ἑνὸς καὶ καταφρονήσει τοῦ ἑτέρου.

δύνασθε δουλεύειν Θεῷ καὶ μαμωνᾷ.

Now, preliminarily, let's throw this versicle at Bing Translate to get a different perspective of this quote. The more different and diverse perspectives you have on the same subject, the higher may be your understanding of it.



Hmm. That's a little awkward. It actually gives the opposite message of what is mainstreamingly portrayed by some sources.

So, what should one do when facing such a problematic situation? There goes the same old "is is true? Or is it a lie?" question all over again.

Now is the time you exercise your discernment. You have two sources claiming exactly opposite things, now it's time to untangle this and see where both opposite standpoints come from:

The word δουλεύειν is related to servitude, though keep in mind that this was written in the ancient Greek times, so this word has a contextual connotation in the form of Antiquity's "servitude": which means slavery. Back then, people could be bought and sold, and that was okay, it was legislated and socially agreed as normal, perhaps even traditional.

Since this is intrinsically correlated with a societal, hierarchy structure that is fundamentally segregational and stratifying — such as a pyramid, such as a STS structure — it makes sense to have only one apex whilst simultaneously hating, ostracizing the other one(s), doesn't it? Only one pharaoh, for instance. Only One Prime Creator and that jazz.

Notwithstanding this, if The One Infinite Creator is All That There is; if All Is One and One Is All; all service is To/From/For God anyhow, isn't it?
Then why is this versicle apparently known to falsely dichotomize stuff such as servitude?

• Well, one of the end-reasons: because of this titanic-ego little fight between the deities to see who's more powerful.
Guess why and how Hesiod's Theogony was made in the first place? Why do you think the titans were overthrown by other deities in a fight of colossal magnitudes?

• Another end-reason: to gather more followers in the so-called one truer path. Reference to the "truth vs. lie" stuff and use your own discernment to differentiate between both. This is one of the reasons why the main, most popular monotheistic religions today (all based on true premises, by the way) all claim that the one true God is, of course, theirs, and all the other ones are false; the path they undertake is, of course, the best (and/or the only possible) path to salvation.

However, as the Scriptures were managed and passed throughout the ages by human beings, there are little clues in all of them that can be perceived, indicating where fallacies, corruptions, and other inconsistencies occur.

The presentation of a limiting binary output is one classic illusion tactics often employed by entities that wish to make you forfeit your free will and covertly force you to choose their presented paths instead of making you think on your own.

Beware and do not be led astray. Such attribute of leading astray, for instance, was attributed to Iblis, in the Quran, for instance. It is said that The Accuser also comes from wandering and erring through earth, in The Bible's Job, just to mention a couple of examples. As an amusing fact on how the mass media also portrays spiritual stuff, there is a whole spiritual dynamic in this game "World of Warcraft", more specifically in this Shadowlands place, an afterlife-like place, structured hierarchically, where people's living forces are drained and harvested to fuel the lives of entities in the other-world. Now where that inspiration comes from?

Also, there is a qualitative divergence in the behaviors of deities in all Scriptures, and also a difference in nomenclature, for instance:

• Yahweh and Elohim in The Bible;
• The One Infinite Creator in The Ra Channelings;
• Prime Creator in the Cassiopaean Material;
and so on.

If you abide to an external imposition, such as by choosing from a limited choice-pool from a technically infinite possibility array, then, according to the fastidious cosmic protocol, your free will was technically not infringed and you're, in practical terms, screwed: such is the Way of Confusion.

For instance: one present you with two letters: A and B, then asking and/or demanding you to choose either one, saying that the other one is terrible while aggrandizing their chosen letter. If you're not wise enough, you may overlook the fact that there are infinite letters in The Creation, as such is the Infinite Magnitude of The Creation. All letters that came to be, come from/to/for The Creation.

After all, The Creation wouldn't have a Universe in which there would be limitations to any extent: such is Infinity.

As means to the aforementioned ends, many forms of non sequitur may be employed, such as affirming the consequent, affirming a disjunct and/or denying a conjunct, among other fallacies.

As always: don't rely on argumentum ab auctoritate to found your own reasoning, for such authority may be wrong, even if sincerely wrong. And also don't dismiss something because someone said it is false. Check for yourself.

Q: (T) How can you be STS through STO if STS is imbalance?
A: STO flows outward and touches all including point of origin, STS flows inward and touches only origin point.

Now we have some mathematics (maybe to the dismay of some) to explain a spiritual dynamic. Interesting, huh?

Q: (L) So, it is necessary that we share this information?
A: Up to you, it is a free will choice.

A: Always “Network”. Networking is 4th Density STO concept seeping into 3rd density with upcoming realm border crossing.

Q: (L) Well that is pleasant...
A: We have told you this before, knowledge protects, ignorance endangers.

And so on. This is but one part of the Cassiopaean material, which, by the way, comes from a variety of sources.

One of the many claims I've seen against such material is because of its so-called "negativity". Now, if you have discernment, you can weed out what is not needed for you and still benefit from what is beneficial to you, from any given knowledge transmitted.

Guess to whom is interesting that you are kept in ignorance about Earth's social structure and dynamics, especially in this period of transition between a raw 3D, purely physical standpoint, and a density of expanded possibilities, such as 4D is?

History is there for you to learn from it.
That's what you're supposed to be doing on your own, and maybe sharing it, so you don't incur the same mistakes that history has cataloged throughout the ages, and perhaps help others to not stumble on already known obstacles.

It is said that The Bible has been corrupted throughout the centuries by multiple and various interests. So what? Weed out the corrupted stuff and benefit from the knowledge contained within.

And just a tiny little caveat: from day one the beings who transmit the so-called Cassiopaean Experiment call themselves Cassiopaean, with this specific vocal ordering. Ra said that the STS ones were in Cassiopeia. There's a phonetic and also a written difference between the two spellings.

So, let's just think — you know, hypothetically — that there are certain alien factions that transmit through the locator known as Cass and to differentiate their frequency to those of a more negative orientation, they call themselves Cassiopaeans instead of Cassiopeians.

Furthermore, even if that's not the case, why would you limit yourself to not seek information, knowledge?
Why would you limit yourself in the expanding of your own individual (and, consequently, your social group and the planet, for we're all interconnected) capabilities by not trying to understand more complicated or even aversive sources to you?
In the worst case scenario (assuming that absolutely 100% of the material provided by them is absolute and utter horseshit) wouldn't you then learn how the so-called corruption works? Wouldn't you then know what to not look or want?

And if, by chance, you exercise your own discernment in order to untangle and weed out the corrupted parts, perhaps you may benefit from identifying the source of such material — such as this "networking" concept, as if it isn't a global tendency anyways, as we, as social beings, need social interaction to survive?

Another central point in your post is this over-reliance on an external source to process life by yourself. If you keep leaning on an external source (instead of your own experience) to guide yourself through life, would that be the most optimal way of living for you?

Wouldn't you, yourself, know how to carve your own path better than someone else who, despite the best of intentions, may have not set the best path specifically for you?

It's like comparing a mass-produced shoe with one specifically built for your Self, taking into account your own anatomy and stuff.

When you lean on external sources — without exercising your own discernment, which comes from a balance of intellect and feeling — to guide and orient yourself in life, you actually disempower yourself by forfeiting your own will and by unquestionably accepting anything that comes from this external source as being the best possible path for you to trail.

Live life on your own terms. Experiment for yourself. After all, you are The Creation in action knowing itself. Enhance this possibility with your own uniqueness applied in this world, with your own authenticity, and not someone else's.

How about that?