Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters Question regarding the Law Of Free Will

    Thread: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #17
    01-31-2011, 02:43 PM
    (01-31-2011, 12:21 PM)jeremy6d Wrote:
    (01-30-2011, 07:55 PM)unity100 Wrote:
    jeremy6d Wrote:It is never an infringement to send pure love/light, formless and without expectation. A universe saturated in love/light would, according to that hypothesis, be infringing on somebody just by pure fact of being.

    technically, it does. the distress the entity is in, may have been chosen pre-incarnation in order to effect various things. by supplying that entity with various energies and changing the energetic situation, it is possible to remove or dampen the dynamics that the entity was going to use as potential to make various choices.

    That is not how I understand these matters, my friend. Why is one catalyst experienced by an entity deemed "chosen" and another "not chosen"? Why is an encounter with an other-self suddenly not itself valid catalyst? This seems like trying to reduce an entity's experiences to "valid catalyst" and "invalid catalyst" without justifying the assertion or accounting for the limited vantage point of the judging party.

    the 'chosen catalyst' subject is a blurred one, and it is a lengthy talk in itself. oftimes which i think that being exaggerated too much.

    however it seems that it does exist, and can be seen in the situations of people around any of us.

    it seems that, it is about internal, spiritual attraction of situations and circumstances to self, or preprogrammed patterns that repeat until something is realized. if you just think, im sure anyone reading this topic will instantly realize that there are such people around them who are repeating such patterns.

    in these cases drive is internal, and often subconscious. people rarely put themselves into quirky situations.

    however in the situation you are describing, the entity, with a conscious decision, does things - sending of any energies whatsoever - without any input or request from the other entity.

    in that, it may easily become an infringement, or in the least, an impediment to the entity. and in such situations, you often may see that the entity refuses or turns down the given energy, or reacts adversely to it, if it is aware of it.

    that is the plight of green ray work. it thinks that green ray is 'da' ray, it can solve anything and is the answer to everything, and sees the existence through that window. it is empathetic, but not finely sculpted enough to be able to sense the delicate nuances and nature of the situation/entity that is being interacted with, in order to be able to understand what the entity needs/desires and what it does not.

    for anyone who started to notice that something is missing in such positive energy encounters, things going awry or problematic, it may be time for them to start working on blue ray and up.

    Quote:I don't disagree here; I just don't see it as significant. The infringement, to my understanding, does not arise because the love/light has a signature. The infringement arises in essence when the love/light is offered with conditions or expectations. That said, there are very few pure radiations of love/light in our density, of course.

    that would be true if there hadnt been an endless number of groupings and divisions in our existence, according to the particular preferences/biases/vibrations of the logoi and the entities that come from them. moreover, we would still be working in situations that wouldnt employ veils, since the purer emanations there would be more amiable due to less infringement. yet, we are told that this was a situation lacking free will, leave aside its infringement. i tend to disagree with this, but with the given information we have, it cant be said that 'purer' -> less infringement.

    you are also taking the path concept a bit shallow. as in taking a path as a concept that one only creates with their conscious mental choices, or spiritual choices out of x, or y possibilities.

    a path is also an energetic journey. in any given stage in the journey, entity will have a particular violet ray radiation, and this radiation will prefer certain other vibrations, and wont prefer others. it is basically a compatibility issue. had there not been such a concept, there would be no impediment to any entity manifesting at any point in any given creation - yet, even nearby logoi tend to stack together and choose similar patterns (last bit Ra tells us in regard to archetypes), incarnating entities tend to choose nearby logoi, (just notice that how close the stars that sent 3d entities to incarnate in this planet are to sol), but more importantly, any given entity seem to prefer grouping with those whose violet vibrations it matches and/or complements.

    had that been a 'purity of green ray' issue, however that is definable, the emphasis and entire meaning of this entire octave would be working on the purity of that green ray, and nothing else would be needed.

    yet, as you can see, an example of an entity who has told to be opened his green chakra to maximum levels, has still graduated from green density, and started 5d density work, as Ra tells us. (the one known as jesus)

    what would pureness change ?

    it would probably change the rejection/turning down of the given energy if it is not compatible. it would be smoother and less problematic.

    Quote:What does not ring true to me, with all due respect, is the idea that radiation of love/light itself is something that should be withheld. I might be wrong about that, but that's my gut feeling. I think this is explained in a Ra quote I'll look for.

    you do not withhold your energies. you dont shove them in in places they are not wanted. moreover, you dont offer them, without being asked.

    leave aside the concept of not giving anything without asked/called being something that is quite often dwelt on in the Ra material, as another curious example Ra relocated from venus, to earth, in order to be of service, despite venus as a planet is able to support 5th and 6th densities quite nicely.

    the problem with green ray is that, it lacks the finesse to be able to discern what is called for, and what is not, by its own vibrations. thats why these are the work of blue ray and higher.

    if you think otherwise, examining the potential examples of barging into a neo nazi hideout in germany or a radical islamist training camp in middle east, radiating love, would be of help. it is extreme, yet the example is in the same format with interacting with other individuals. you dont barge in without being called.

    Quote:I agree that it seems like a silver bullet, at least to one who places a great deal of emphasis on wisdom and the nuanced employ of our capabilities.

    quite. had green ray been the answer to everything, there would be only 4 densities in our octave.

    (01-31-2011, 02:15 PM)BlatzAdict Wrote: at that point.. we're going into the territory of balancing wisdom/compassion

    the stage we are discussing is not yet the stage of that balance judging from the properties. being able to sense what is requested and what is not, is yet the work of blue ray, communication and expression.

    quite right in that when it moves to indigo, the co creatorship of how much what you do becomes the centerpoint of the work, in the form of balance though. it is a very delicate work.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked unity100 for this post:1 member thanked unity100 for this post
      • BlatzAdict
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-30-2011, 06:34 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by spero - 01-30-2011, 07:53 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by kycahi - 01-30-2011, 01:21 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-30-2011, 02:13 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-30-2011, 03:10 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-30-2011, 05:31 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-30-2011, 05:55 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by rva_jeremy - 01-30-2011, 07:40 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-30-2011, 07:55 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by kycahi - 01-30-2011, 09:50 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-30-2011, 10:05 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-31-2011, 02:29 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-31-2011, 11:44 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by rva_jeremy - 01-31-2011, 12:21 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-31-2011, 02:43 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-31-2011, 02:53 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by AnthroHeart - 01-31-2011, 10:33 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-31-2011, 02:15 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by rva_jeremy - 01-31-2011, 03:22 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 01-31-2011, 03:55 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 01-31-2011, 04:19 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by rva_jeremy - 01-31-2011, 04:23 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by Aaron - 01-31-2011, 10:08 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by unity100 - 02-01-2011, 12:04 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by zenmaster - 01-31-2011, 10:35 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 02-15-2011, 05:11 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by zenmaster - 02-19-2011, 08:02 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 02-19-2011, 09:50 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by Crown - 02-15-2011, 06:03 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 02-15-2011, 07:13 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by Aaron - 02-19-2011, 07:20 PM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 02-26-2011, 01:41 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by Confused - 02-26-2011, 02:26 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by BlatzAdict - 02-26-2011, 02:32 AM
    RE: Question regarding the Law Of Free Will - by Confused - 02-26-2011, 02:40 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode