Was Evil invented by mistake ?

[Aion]

Yes but it also equally chooses good, so when two opposing choices have been equally made what is the result?

I thought it was said that the part of us choosing evil is much smaller then the part choosing good.  So it's not equal.  But the weird thing about STS is that it removes choices from others.  Not remove the choice of STS or STO, because it actually creates that choice.  But there was still a choice in 3d before the veil.

You are thinking purely quantitatively, trying to compare the "numbers of positive vs the numbers of negative" and I'm not sure that's actually reflective of the balance of Choice.
Of course, not that those numbers are meaningless, I just think the numbers are a manifestation of the current phase of "mixing", as it were.
The end of the perfectly balanced universe will be when all that has been positive has been negative and vice versa, I think.
To suggest that the Creator has a bias means that Creator itself would have some kind of preference, but it does not, it gleefully moves in whatever direction choice allows.
That is to say, it moves towards both choices with the same fervor and dedication. It does not hesitate on one or the other.

So that's what I mean by chooses both equally.

In the eyes of the One there is no good or evil, no right or wrong, only unity. The Creator is both the victim and the perpetrator in all situations.
Anyways, that's how it all appears to me.

19.15 Questioner: Then the newest third-density beings who’ve just made the transition from second are still strongly biased towards self-service. There must be many other mechanisms to create an awareness of the possibility of service to others.
I am wondering, first— two things. I’m wondering about the mechanism and I am wondering when the split takes place where the entity is able to continue on the road towards service to self that will eventually take him to fourth or fifth density.
I would assume that an entity can continue— can start, say, in second density with service totally to self and continue right on through and just stay on what we would call the path of service to self and never ever be pulled over. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The second-density concept of serving self includes the serving of those associated with tribe or pack. This is not seen in second density as separation of self and other-self. All is seen as self since in some forms of second-density entities, if the tribe or pack becomes weakened, so does the entity within the tribe or pack.

The new or initial third-density entity has this innocent, shall we say, bias or distortion towards viewing those in the family, the society, as you would call, perhaps, country, as self. Thus though a distortion not helpful for progress in third density, it is without polarity.

The break becomes apparent when the entity perceives other-selves as other-selves and consciously determines to manipulate other-selves for the benefit of the self. This is the beginning of the road of which you speak.

A key component to this idea of STS is being "conscious", and even by Ra's expression a lot of the negatively happening on the planet is "misplaced positivity" rather than genuine negative polarization.

Thus, we have an individuated portion of the Creator becoming aware of itself as individuated and choosing to benefit itself first and foremost.

On the other side, we would have an individuated portion of the Creator becoming aware of itself as individuated and choosing to benefit others first and foremost.

To those who have chosen the reasons for each may seem obvious, but I think there is a very deep and rich exploration to be seen in asking the question, "why?"

Ra says that most people are well along their path before becoming consciously aware of it which means there are other biases that go in to this beyond just being consciously aware.
What are the things that could perhaps cause someone to lean one way or the other?