My take on masks.

[curio_city]

newsletter

I get even crazier 'newsletters' (aka spam) coming from US sources, blabbering nonsense about covid, not limited to masks.

And they all come from the US.

Because there is no other country where you can get whatever 'research' you want produced by throwing a few million dollars at a private 'think thank'.

Its not that anybody is producing research for this anyway - they are just making it up.

While in the real world...

Statements like "solidarity with your community," "taking seriously the responsibility for keeping your community healthy," and "strong communal ethic" seem to indicate an inclination toward communism.

It is.

Just see how much communal you will get when you start sharing not only your energy, but even your own memories with your 4d smc...

Is there any indication in the Law of One that individuals of our density should be inclined toward community over individual?

Wow... If you are asking that after reading the entire material...

Thank you for your response. I think it's important here to make a distinction between 4th density and the one in which we relate our experiences. Ra was able only to approximate 4th density. One statement of 4th density that stands out to me (16.50): "[I]t is a plane wherein individual differences are pronounced although automatically harmonized by group consensus." I believe what we have in most communities is far from the combined call of a social memory complex, such that an insistence on this -- as well as on communism as a vehicle -- is not only impracticable, but it precisely embodies the elitist thought so prominently displayed by proponents of socialism and communism. A social memory complex is a side effect of a call so united that it far outweighs the individual.

As far as my question:

Is there any indication in the Law of One that individuals of our density should be inclined toward community over individual?

I think it's important here to note that in my question, I assert that the more prominent position in the Law of One would be "individuals... inclined toward... individual." That statement does not imply service to self. In fact, the way I view service to others is very much "individual toward individual." Whenever thinking of service to others, I believe others should be considered as individuals, not as part of some social memory complex with thought-sharing that does not yet exist here -- as far as I know.