08-21-2020, 02:27 PM
(08-21-2020, 12:14 PM)Jade Wrote: Honestly, it's my opinion that if you think masks are a sign of oppression, you're probably in the lucky minority that has never actually experienced medical/governmental/societal oppression. If wearing a mask makes you feel uncomfortable, then it's your prerogative the make the choice that brings you the most comfort. However, Ra gives us a simple metric to express the polarity of each use of catalyst:
Quote:64.16 Questioner: Let us assume that a bodily distortion occurs within a particular entity who then has a choice of seeking allopathic aid or experiencing the catalyst of the distortion and not seeking correction of the distortion. Can you comment on [the] two possibilities for this entity and his analysis of each path?
Ra: I am Ra. If the entity is polarized towards service to others, analysis properly proceeds along the lines of consideration of which path offers the most opportunity for service to others.
For the negatively polarized entity the antithesis is the case.
For the unpolarized entity the considerations are random and most likely in the direction of the distortion towards comfort.
Can you please elaborate on what constitutes medical/governmental/societal oppression, as well as give some detail on its occurrence today?
In my original post, I ponder whether mask-wearing is really what's the best for everyone and consider some ways it may be counter to best interests; I appreciate a Ra quote that so directly supports the viewpoint as a positive one.
If Jesus were alive today, do you think he would wear a mask?