12-28-2010, 06:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-28-2010, 07:15 AM by Protonexus.)
Linear thinking is the use of step by step logic to evaluate and solve a problem or innovate upon a set of conditions. Linear thinking is utilizing a single perspective (point of origin), taking conclusions reached from observations of that single perspective and then applying the same logic to another situation that appears similar/the same. This mode of thinking emphasizes words and numbers in an objective manner.
Circular thinking is the usage of cycles to obtain results or analyze a set of conditions. This approach typically utilizes multiple perspectives dependent upon what portion of the cycle is applicable to the purposes of the evaluation. This approach considers the subjectivity of conditions in that no situation is ever the same. The point of origin is used as a base and the spin is measured from the point of origin to the secondary point to determine conditions. This mode of thinking emphasizes images and fractals in a subjective manner.
Neither is the better approach, a balance of both modes is preferrable due to the inherent properties of application.
Then there is, to use a buzzword, quantum thinking. A means which is not one or the other but the synthesis of logic and intuition - linear progression and chaotic/drastic shifts. This is centered in the evaluation of every situation as being unique and holding a potential ray of results. Quantum thinking also takes into account the subjectivity and ability of the observer to consciously steer the moment of now through the ray of potential. The most probable events of a time segment/arc are intuitively known and the affects of the concious interaction with those events can be predicted within a range of certainty so that the relationship of the quantum thinker can match up with an event in now in a fairly accurate nexus.
Circular thinking is the usage of cycles to obtain results or analyze a set of conditions. This approach typically utilizes multiple perspectives dependent upon what portion of the cycle is applicable to the purposes of the evaluation. This approach considers the subjectivity of conditions in that no situation is ever the same. The point of origin is used as a base and the spin is measured from the point of origin to the secondary point to determine conditions. This mode of thinking emphasizes images and fractals in a subjective manner.
Neither is the better approach, a balance of both modes is preferrable due to the inherent properties of application.
Then there is, to use a buzzword, quantum thinking. A means which is not one or the other but the synthesis of logic and intuition - linear progression and chaotic/drastic shifts. This is centered in the evaluation of every situation as being unique and holding a potential ray of results. Quantum thinking also takes into account the subjectivity and ability of the observer to consciously steer the moment of now through the ray of potential. The most probable events of a time segment/arc are intuitively known and the affects of the concious interaction with those events can be predicted within a range of certainty so that the relationship of the quantum thinker can match up with an event in now in a fairly accurate nexus.