UFO's/Abductions/Hybrids

[zenmaster]

Ra spoke at great length about the higher densities. If Ra had deemed that info unimportant to us, they would have told us, as they did whenever Don asked other 'transient' questions.

Apparently Ra felt there was value in us having access to that info pertaining to the higher densities.

What assumptions were made that led you to interpret what you quoted as implying unimportance of what Ra related about higher densities?

Your statement:

do you not see the futility in 3rd density's attempts to project meaning and purpose on 4th-density beings' activities? Yet we, almost invariably, do it anyway and the result typically reveals our own projections.

Since we are currently 3D, and Ra spoke at length about 4D activities, then whenever we study Ra's words, are we not doing just that? ie. attempting to understand the activities of higher density beings?

Why would Ra impart this knowledge, if our attempt to understand it is futile?

But our attempt to understand what we experience is never futile.

Ra's 'adept' realizes that magical working involves symbolic or metaphorical reality. Being mind and spirit-based, the understanding involved in this working is more fundamental than our mechanistic, conventional thinking and feeling based approach of understanding and evaluating. In this symbolic mind-realm, everything (raw information) tends to have a dynamic, subjective, and non-determined quality (although, like matter, it's subject to fixed laws).

Now imagine that the 'advanced' 3rd density adept is something like a mentally retarded 4th density preschooler in all developmental categories (spiritual, intellectual, affective, moral, etc) . There is no way to perform an adequate rational evaluation of the 'thought process', as it were, of a 4th-density being. That is, one that would actually match the motivation, strategy or game-plan of the being. They do not have the same linear, chain-of-thought constraint. Do you see how we depend on causal attributions to understand any activity (human or otherwise)? Any motive, morality, or plan that we can invent to 'make sense' of their activities is a projection, that will mainly serve to tell us something about ourselves.

What we *can* do, however, is to perceive how such activity *affects us here*. We can think about what the effects of such action means to us, and act accordingly.