11-21-2017, 05:39 PM
The spoken of techniques include the one's you gave as an example silly. To focus on the love in the moment. Carla's book Living the Law of One explained very fluently how chakra balancing can lead to attracting different catalyst, to eventually becoming a lighthouse by moving kundalini to indigo ray, to begin manifesting more rapidly our disciplined thoughts directed at love.
If that discipline is disregarded, Ra's mentioning of severe imbalance seems like a gentle way of saying some pretty serious stuff is going to happen to you.
Hence I think guidance is helpful. Now, you use the word control as if I were aiming to deprive people of naturally moving into a certain kind of catalyst. If they are there, I want to help guide them out of that place. If they're not yet there, I want to help steer them clear of that path. Putting up a sign saying detour isn't controlling to me when its done for another's sake.
If with that done a person still wants to take that road, experience that catalyst, I won't stop them, and I'll even let them know I'll be here waiting to help them if they want. I understand I had to experience that to become whom I am now, but I know it's done some damage that I'm still recovering from, if another desires such, so be it, but I walked into that place as the Fool, very naive of what was to come. Other's can now walk into that place with an idea of what's to come, and now lacking total naivete can go further than I in making good use of that catalyst.
I used to have such thoughts at the forefront of my mind, the why's of evil and how such is necessary and inherently good. I still feel that way but I don't think everyone needs to go through whatever willynilly catalyst they're walking towards. If they're not there yet, a few warning signs and helpful guide signs might just put them on a better track.
This is like a classic time travel argument, if someone is meant to experience a hell path but along the way someone who has already traveled that path curves them to the outskirts of hell rather than right through it, was it wrong to redirect that person to a different path? Will they still somehow end up where they're meant to be or is where they're meant to be now different?
As I said, I think putting up helpful detour signs isn't controlling. In fact I note that many people don't even understand what accounts for control, or hence polarization and depolarization when the nuances of subtlety occur. If we took guiding an entity to be a controlling act, our spirit guides would be quite selfish. I think in the case of working with information such as taking deep to mind and heart the perceptions of the world a certain way to accelerate polarization, in this case, to see everything with iunconditional love, we open up the power of the Law of Attraction, we begin attracting what we put out. Thoughts, words, actions, and the intensity of those things.
So if we go from daily worship of the sacredness of creation, to being hit with the bodily catalyst of chronic depression, where you inevitably lose that inner control to a neural imbalance, you might compound that catalyst with the deep spiritual catalyst of deepening or magnifying that depression into some warped experience of misery.
And such may not be needed but a consequence of not properly taking care of that inevitable catalytic need of the chemical balancing of the body. In that light, the compounded catalyst of magnified depression is not needed, but accidentally triggered.
I'm trying to disarm those triggers from blasting people into some extremely low vibratory spaces that come off hellish.
Call it controlling, but its one way I'm going to try to be of service to others here. If someone starts talking like me, about some dark stuff that they came across while doing work in consciousness such as rapid polarization, I'll help them out of it, rather than leave them to grope and grasp their way out that place.
I feel like that seems only right, to help others more easily through that which took me a year to get through.
And I can appreciate how such experiences shaped me, but I may not appreciate the overall darkened shape from after the vividness of such an experience.
You are fine with letting wanderers wander into fire, you rationalize it well with what this material teaches. I don't subscribe 100% to the Ra Material, there's bits and pieces that human wise are basically immoral and irresponsible. Such as in this instance, to just let people wander into hell by the practices provided without guidance and to let that place shape them. It is oddly inconsiderate of what the entity desires instead overwriting that for ideas of what was 'meant to be', except life isn't predetermined or free form, there's a mixture, and I'll use that mixture to make sure someone isn't shaped darkly by dark experiences that I could have steered them clear of. Especially if they do not want such experiences.
We often give precedence to The OIC, and writeoff the small bits as if we were bacteria. You don't think twice about removing bacteria, its so small and seemingly insignificant. I won't disregard portions of creator to fulfill this lame will of the creator to experience itself. That can be misconstrued to basically help people suffer. That's not very selfless to make others suffer for the gain of their overwatching coexisting deityself.
God doesn't deserve more consideration than the parts that make it up. We're all equal here so if God itself came meandering along right towards hell I'd do the same for it.
"Hey God, that's a very dark path, are you sure you want to go that way? It's kind of hellish." And if God says yes, so be it, but I like to think, since we're all god's in veil, God would turn to me and say "Oh! Good to know!" And take a different route.
I mean, we can argue that things like mass shootings and such are meant to be, but I'm very sure everyone who experienced that would've wished someone detoured them.
I don't see how it's wrong to do such as such.
I appreciate the experience, but I do not resonate with the idea of letting painful things happen because God said so.
Just as God is fine with animal slaughter, rape, torture, and murder, I'm not at that godly placement of detachment to just be well with that, in a way I as a human am arguably here to provide love in ways to hopefully eventually make it so that animals need not be slaughtered or people suffer from torture or rape.
I'm sure the creator wouldn't mind one way or another, just so long as I experienced for it.
This is a fun example of how reality exists as dynamic tensions. What's right to do? What's wrong to do? How can we tell?
If that discipline is disregarded, Ra's mentioning of severe imbalance seems like a gentle way of saying some pretty serious stuff is going to happen to you.
Hence I think guidance is helpful. Now, you use the word control as if I were aiming to deprive people of naturally moving into a certain kind of catalyst. If they are there, I want to help guide them out of that place. If they're not yet there, I want to help steer them clear of that path. Putting up a sign saying detour isn't controlling to me when its done for another's sake.
If with that done a person still wants to take that road, experience that catalyst, I won't stop them, and I'll even let them know I'll be here waiting to help them if they want. I understand I had to experience that to become whom I am now, but I know it's done some damage that I'm still recovering from, if another desires such, so be it, but I walked into that place as the Fool, very naive of what was to come. Other's can now walk into that place with an idea of what's to come, and now lacking total naivete can go further than I in making good use of that catalyst.
I used to have such thoughts at the forefront of my mind, the why's of evil and how such is necessary and inherently good. I still feel that way but I don't think everyone needs to go through whatever willynilly catalyst they're walking towards. If they're not there yet, a few warning signs and helpful guide signs might just put them on a better track.
This is like a classic time travel argument, if someone is meant to experience a hell path but along the way someone who has already traveled that path curves them to the outskirts of hell rather than right through it, was it wrong to redirect that person to a different path? Will they still somehow end up where they're meant to be or is where they're meant to be now different?
As I said, I think putting up helpful detour signs isn't controlling. In fact I note that many people don't even understand what accounts for control, or hence polarization and depolarization when the nuances of subtlety occur. If we took guiding an entity to be a controlling act, our spirit guides would be quite selfish. I think in the case of working with information such as taking deep to mind and heart the perceptions of the world a certain way to accelerate polarization, in this case, to see everything with iunconditional love, we open up the power of the Law of Attraction, we begin attracting what we put out. Thoughts, words, actions, and the intensity of those things.
So if we go from daily worship of the sacredness of creation, to being hit with the bodily catalyst of chronic depression, where you inevitably lose that inner control to a neural imbalance, you might compound that catalyst with the deep spiritual catalyst of deepening or magnifying that depression into some warped experience of misery.
And such may not be needed but a consequence of not properly taking care of that inevitable catalytic need of the chemical balancing of the body. In that light, the compounded catalyst of magnified depression is not needed, but accidentally triggered.
I'm trying to disarm those triggers from blasting people into some extremely low vibratory spaces that come off hellish.
Call it controlling, but its one way I'm going to try to be of service to others here. If someone starts talking like me, about some dark stuff that they came across while doing work in consciousness such as rapid polarization, I'll help them out of it, rather than leave them to grope and grasp their way out that place.
I feel like that seems only right, to help others more easily through that which took me a year to get through.
And I can appreciate how such experiences shaped me, but I may not appreciate the overall darkened shape from after the vividness of such an experience.
You are fine with letting wanderers wander into fire, you rationalize it well with what this material teaches. I don't subscribe 100% to the Ra Material, there's bits and pieces that human wise are basically immoral and irresponsible. Such as in this instance, to just let people wander into hell by the practices provided without guidance and to let that place shape them. It is oddly inconsiderate of what the entity desires instead overwriting that for ideas of what was 'meant to be', except life isn't predetermined or free form, there's a mixture, and I'll use that mixture to make sure someone isn't shaped darkly by dark experiences that I could have steered them clear of. Especially if they do not want such experiences.
We often give precedence to The OIC, and writeoff the small bits as if we were bacteria. You don't think twice about removing bacteria, its so small and seemingly insignificant. I won't disregard portions of creator to fulfill this lame will of the creator to experience itself. That can be misconstrued to basically help people suffer. That's not very selfless to make others suffer for the gain of their overwatching coexisting deityself.
God doesn't deserve more consideration than the parts that make it up. We're all equal here so if God itself came meandering along right towards hell I'd do the same for it.
"Hey God, that's a very dark path, are you sure you want to go that way? It's kind of hellish." And if God says yes, so be it, but I like to think, since we're all god's in veil, God would turn to me and say "Oh! Good to know!" And take a different route.
I mean, we can argue that things like mass shootings and such are meant to be, but I'm very sure everyone who experienced that would've wished someone detoured them.
I don't see how it's wrong to do such as such.
I appreciate the experience, but I do not resonate with the idea of letting painful things happen because God said so.
Just as God is fine with animal slaughter, rape, torture, and murder, I'm not at that godly placement of detachment to just be well with that, in a way I as a human am arguably here to provide love in ways to hopefully eventually make it so that animals need not be slaughtered or people suffer from torture or rape.
I'm sure the creator wouldn't mind one way or another, just so long as I experienced for it.
This is a fun example of how reality exists as dynamic tensions. What's right to do? What's wrong to do? How can we tell?