How seriously do you take the Law of One? How has it effected you?

[Aleksi]

I must admit to a sight distaste in that thought process, to dive right in.

I feel this distaste for one reason that has eluded me for years but now I see it a bit clearly.

The Ra Material offers extremely sensitive information of kundalini and more, magical powers, and even more, a study on the archetypal foundations of the natures of reality.  They offer things like control of thoughts and emotions.  Change of inner and outer perceptions, self creation moment by moment.

All of this information is given with a very basic warning of severe imbalance.

This is like giving a child a gun, and saying to be careful with it or bad things will happen.  The child has no clue as to the severity of what those bad things are.  He finds out the hard way by accidentally killing himself or another out of ignorant use of that powerful tool given to him.

And this is ignoring the fact Ra pretty much states that polarization leads to traumatic catalyst, with rapid polarization leading to inevitable trauma very often.

There is lacking some deep sincere warning offered, its given as a passing remark almost.

So, I would like to append our own warning to those who wish to perform the moment by moment magic of the Law of One.  It is a huge responsibility for...Us human child-gods to work with.

It is not enough to take it seriously.  There is a discipline involved that must be learned and it must be taken in deeply and made routine.  To just dive in is probably the most dangerous thing one can do, with all of their usualness of human being, the noisy mind and turbulent oceanic emotions all invite one to basically alter their consciousness and perceptions to see as easily Hell as they could see Heaven.

In fact the only point where any real warning of depth is given is when Ra tells us misuse of the archetypes can lead to splintering the personality (that thing that makes human you YOU).

I take this stuff way too seriously sometimes because in all the light of the Material, darkness shines through at points as well.  Omission of the dangers of these practices for starters.   The dangers of kundalini activation and rising kundalini.  The dangers of discovering how to change your perceptions and the many stumbling blocks that come with all of those dangers.

From people losing their minds to thinking they are losing their minds to dissociation from physical reality and delusions including believing oneself light enough to be tormented by dark beings when most people have no reason to be.

The Law of One can, and in my opinion, should start out as just a philosophy book.  Any further movements to turn it into a lifestyle should be guided by those who already have to help people, like myself, who might need more guidance than another with performing these things in a safe way that won't lead to severe imbalance.

You can't teach/learn all by yourself.  For those alienated wanderers like myself who are very alone in their physical lives, diving into living the Law of One can be very dangerous, especially to people with sensitive nervous systems, even more so the more sensitive the system as the onset of changes will be even more brutal, sudden, and inexplicable.

Otherwise, I agree with the majority of your post, I got triggered and do get triggered with this material.  It has dangerous potential, I feel some warning should be offered with it yet there isn't one.  It often makes me wonder in frustration why an highly advanced from our perspective, being giving such information would skip out on offering a few precautions or warnings as to what should be avoided and what should be aimed towards.

In many ways it almost seems like the positive word choices and thoughts by Ra had to avoid such negative portrayals, yet in a dualistic 3D reality such mentionings have a positive reason.  So why did Ra exclude such warnings beyond a remark here or there?  You'd think even one full answer offering in a way some great caution would pop up, but instead they're offered with very little emphasis.

Anyway, regardless of such things, I do agree with everything else you say, and want to emphasize that seriousness of belief is required to make anything in the Law of One appear in such a way as to be proofworthy subjectively.

Perhaps Ra doesn't see the dangers very seriously, since some years of torment and insanity would seem like a laughably short time to a 6D being. And the torment can be skipped, I suspect, by having faith that all is well and suffering and pleasure are two sides of the same coin.