10-13-2017, 08:31 PM
(09-21-2017, 10:39 AM)The Traveler Wrote: Hi everyone,
I'm looking for insight regarding Michael Newton's books "Journey of Souls" and "Destiny of Souls" and how it compares/relates to information in The Law of One.
In Michael Newton's books he regresses many people over the years and we are able to learn about life back home (in the spirit world). We learn that Souls choose their assignments and aren't forced to incarnate at all. They can remain in spirit and continue their studies but at a much slower rate (which makes sense to me). Reading his books I get a good sense of Free Will but I don't get that same feeling from The Law of One.
I'm not really sure how to put this but sometimes The Law of One seems "cold" to me and I don't really get a sense of Free Will from it, gosh I don't know how to explain it but I hope someone here can catch my drift.
69.6 Ra: the death by suicide causing the necessity for much healing work and, shall we say, the making of a dedication to the third density for the renewed opportunity of learning the lessons set by the higher self.
"Making of a dedication"? and "learning the lessons set by the higher self"? That doesn't sound like Free Will to me or maybe I'm not understanding?
Another thing, The Law of One speaks of walking the Steps of Light but nowhere in Michael Newton's books do the regressed souls speak of this, there are however souls that attend a "Graduation Party" where they arrive back home in the spirit world and their friends throw a party cause they are moving up in development. He notes that souls have different colours based on their development so young souls will be white and the very advanced ones will be from blue to violet and most of the time souls groups are mixed where you will have young and advanced together, like there is no sense of seperation and everyone can see each other. But then in The Law of One it sounds like if you dont graduate to to 4th Density then your f#cked and have to repeat.
Is Michael Newton's books utter rubbish or is The Law of One focusing on something else??
Hope someone can shed some light on this.
Here is a picture of the colours of soul development:
I really loved Michael Newton's work, but for me, some parts didn't make sense compared to the Ra material. So, I guess that I'm in the same boat, but perhaps on another side of it?
Anyways, I thought about this same issue for a while after reading Michael Newton works couple of years ago, and then I arrived at this. On one hand, I really *loved and enjoyed* his work, but on the other hand, some parts of his work didn't make sense to me compared to the Ra material. How to integrate it? But then I got a thought that integrated it all, and that was that - creation is infinite. What doesn't resonate with me, is true for another self. Which means that not everything that is stated in the Ra material has to be true for you, and not everything which is stated in M.N's work has to be true for me. There are as many variations as there are teachings and books. That's why our positively oriented friends always tell us to take what resonates.
My point is to not take parts of Ra material which do not resonate with you, but instead to integrate those parts of Newton's work which do!