11-08-2010, 06:13 PM
(11-08-2010, 02:09 PM)@ndy Wrote: I agree, but wasn't Yahweh doing what they believed to be the right thing.
Just as a parent would try and help, the infant still has free will.
The parent can't know in advance what the child will do with that - but dose what they think to be the best for the child.
I think we've strayed far from the original analogy, which was to illustrate the wisdom (or lack thereof) of a parent knowingly allowing their child to harm others on a massive scale. This isn't a 'maybe' but after the fact. In this case, the children had already been violent on a massive scale. So to give those children the means to repeat it, would be akin to a parent giving the materials to build a homemade bomb, to a child who has already succeeded in blowing up the school.
The philosophical question is whether giving the child more bomb-making materials, and thus endangering his classmates, is the wisest choice for finding out whether he's learned his lesson or not.
That's the analogy being offered here.
(11-08-2010, 02:09 PM)@ndy Wrote: We all know people who are a little lazy and would benefit from helping themselves. It's more situations like this I am referring too - were the best way to 'help' is not always clear cut.
Yes, I agree, it's not always clear-cut.
For purposes of the analogy, I was trying to make the point that we wouldn't let our children harm others, just because they wanted to.