Upcoming social dlimena, true sharing

[Cobrien]

You said it. The rearrangement of societal structures, will do nothing to alleviate the problem. Third density is all about realising love, and just how inadequate societal constructs really are. Your suppose to come into the alignment of "something is off here..." In third density.  The embrace of unconditional love is to be far more wanted than any societal construct rearrangement.

THIS.  The point is not that activism and reform are therefore irrelevant; it's that activism and reform without the change in thinking just keeps reproducing the same problems.  Only by appealing to a different part of our experience, one not so separate, are the consequent actions going to actually help inculcate something new and revolutionary.  Not because we've "figured out how to do activism", but because the activism and reform emerge from a truly creative and unifying place.  Reform follows the change in thinking, not vice versa, and as we each change our thinking more and more of this change that we don't plan but rather love into existence becomes possible.

I think this Eisenstein quote from The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know Is Possible really puts it poignantly:

The same interbeingness that makes us so immensely vulnerable also makes us immensely powerful. Remember this! Indeed, the vulnerability and the power go hand in hand, because only by relaxing the guard of the separate self can we tap into power beyond its ken. Only then can we accomplish things that are, to the separate self, impossible. Put another way, we become capable of things that we don’t know how to “make” happen.

I love that! "We become capable of things we don't know how to make happen."  Cobrien et al, I highly recommend this book to you!

I somewhat disagree with you. Within the collective everyone operates at a different gradient. "As above, so below". The capability of the least of us is the limiting factor in a call as free will must be preserved. Therefore change will happen thru social activities and government. The intensity or motivating factor has elements in every ray. Agreed, the totality of experience is far greater. However actionable change is incremental. The inertia of how we got here is not likely to be subject to spontaneous reogranization. Thinking is tangible and becoming more so. As the illusion becomes denser there is greater catalyst for change. The crux of the issue is how does one frame change. Self, creator, other self, war or rumors of war.

Its interesting to me how transparency will take hold in the opposite order as wedive from our most eccenric collective distortions to the least