Lotsa Questions

[rva_jeremy]

I explored for a while negative polarity and found it to be in many ways on the shallow end of it's spectrum exactly like positive polarity, leaving me to wonder if polarity is something worth getting hung up over on since as it's said, there is no right or wrong according to the metaphysical reality.  (A general statement that I'm sure has some exceptions to it.)

8. Is the negative and positive polarities worth exploring into the extremes?  I know the answer depends on the individual, I'm asking in general for the vast majority of the population.
9. Can the negative be used for positive?  Does this make it negative or positive polarization?
10. If selflessness is positive polarity and selfishness is negative polarity, what does being selfishly selfless and selflessly selfish cause polarization wise?

I'd like to take these in tandem.  One of the things implied in the choice of polarity is precisely what has value to an entity (this is why the innate bias of an entity is so confounding a mystery).  I think entities can and do explore both polarities, and the veiled condition is precisely where this delivers the most worthwhile catalyst to an entity.  
But remember that the ultimate product of this process is to make the choice in a subjectively significant way.  Emphasis on the last part: in a subjectively significant way, not because there are no generalities involved, but because as I said in the last post, we simply don't occupy the vantage point from where there is an objective view.  I do think there exists an objective view, but it's in time/space, where an entity's polarity can be directly observed as an energetic phenomenon created by patterns of thought.
If you accept my explanation that the root of polarity is energetic (this is my current model; I'm open to having this challenged) then answering #9 and #10 becomes a somewhat easier task, don't they?  It has less to do with getting to some root philosophy of rule set and more to do with understanding the intent evidenced by the opening/closing of energy centers.  I mean, both questions throw into stark relief how sticky these kinds of concerns are, what tangled webs we weave.  But if we focus on energetic flow, we have a feedback loop for our thoughts and intent that is at least personally verifiable.