12-20-2016, 04:37 PM
I haven't read everything you/Ra wrote, but I will say these words before I forget them. I believe I know precisely what is meant by far-seeing.
My understanding is that each thought is its own complex. A thought is like a core of data whose surroundings consists of other thoughts. The core is connected to its surrounding material through associations. For the sake of this idea, you may call these associative thoughts "lesser thoughts" in relation to the original core thought, because what makes them lesser is how intense the associative connection is to the core thought. Each thought can be treated as an individual core. You can learn to follow thoughts through association, and the cores will organize themselves according to your energetic input. Thoughts do form pathways or rivers, if you will. Thoughts are their own environments. My hypothesis/suggestion is that the events of our lives are like these cores. Let me give an example of associative thoughts:
Suppose I think of winter. What comes to mind?
Winter --> snowflake --> Christmas --> Santa clause --> presents & gifts --> gratefulness --> experiences to be grateful for --> friends --> certain great experiences with friends --> perhaps I think about a sentimental object or environment that was present with those friends --> this leads me to think that maybe I should contact or arrange a meeting with my friends --> I will remind my friends of those experiences and as they re-awaken the glorious emotions of those events, this will only lead us to think and act on new exciting experiences and adventures.
Now you may see that a snowflake has little to do with my friends, but you can see that somehow they were connected. On some level of the mind, all possibilities are open and seen, (in the deeper true-colors rather [meta]visually). Remember that thoughts will form particular pathways according to the tendencies of focus of a given entity or mind/body/spirit complex. Remember that I could have followed an infinite variety of paths from the idea of winter. Each thought complex contains an infinite amount of nuances of melody.
This associative thought process would have happened with great intensity and focus in such a way that a thought "sequence" could carry more information than a basic thought in the conscious mind. That means one could think far more in less time. I know this from experience in deeper states of consciousness. My understanding is also that in third-density, it is far more challenging to be aware of and choose one's thoughts, and change the intensity of focus/attention placed upon them. Perhaps it could be said that this far-seeing was one major reason why pre-veil societies were very innovative. Their deep mind was the conscious mind, and they could "see" more and focus on a thought complex with more intensity. It can also be recognized that the envisioning and far-seeing is an attribute of the multidimensionality of the mind.
I think that a few of Seth's words can help you to see what I mean when I say that each thought is a complex:
If someone asked me to describe thoughts with just one sentence, I would probably say this: "Thoughts are emotional webs of deep purposes whose magic guides the thinker into new dimensions of Life."
My understanding is that each thought is its own complex. A thought is like a core of data whose surroundings consists of other thoughts. The core is connected to its surrounding material through associations. For the sake of this idea, you may call these associative thoughts "lesser thoughts" in relation to the original core thought, because what makes them lesser is how intense the associative connection is to the core thought. Each thought can be treated as an individual core. You can learn to follow thoughts through association, and the cores will organize themselves according to your energetic input. Thoughts do form pathways or rivers, if you will. Thoughts are their own environments. My hypothesis/suggestion is that the events of our lives are like these cores. Let me give an example of associative thoughts:
Suppose I think of winter. What comes to mind?
Winter --> snowflake --> Christmas --> Santa clause --> presents & gifts --> gratefulness --> experiences to be grateful for --> friends --> certain great experiences with friends --> perhaps I think about a sentimental object or environment that was present with those friends --> this leads me to think that maybe I should contact or arrange a meeting with my friends --> I will remind my friends of those experiences and as they re-awaken the glorious emotions of those events, this will only lead us to think and act on new exciting experiences and adventures.
Now you may see that a snowflake has little to do with my friends, but you can see that somehow they were connected. On some level of the mind, all possibilities are open and seen, (in the deeper true-colors rather [meta]visually). Remember that thoughts will form particular pathways according to the tendencies of focus of a given entity or mind/body/spirit complex. Remember that I could have followed an infinite variety of paths from the idea of winter. Each thought complex contains an infinite amount of nuances of melody.
This associative thought process would have happened with great intensity and focus in such a way that a thought "sequence" could carry more information than a basic thought in the conscious mind. That means one could think far more in less time. I know this from experience in deeper states of consciousness. My understanding is also that in third-density, it is far more challenging to be aware of and choose one's thoughts, and change the intensity of focus/attention placed upon them. Perhaps it could be said that this far-seeing was one major reason why pre-veil societies were very innovative. Their deep mind was the conscious mind, and they could "see" more and focus on a thought complex with more intensity. It can also be recognized that the envisioning and far-seeing is an attribute of the multidimensionality of the mind.
I think that a few of Seth's words can help you to see what I mean when I say that each thought is a complex:
Quote:...Remember, these mental associations are living things. They are formations
of energy assembled into invisible structures, through processes
quite as valid and complicated as the organization of any group of cells.
Comparing them with cells, they are of briefer duration, generally speaking,
though under certain conditions this does not apply. But your
thoughts form structures as real as the cells. Their composition is different
in that no solidity is involved in your terms.
As living cells have a structure, react to stimuli and organize according
to their own classification, so do thoughts. Thoughts thrive on association.
They magnetically attract others like themselves, and like some
strange microscopic animals they repel their "enemies," or other
thoughts that are threatening to their own survival.
If someone asked me to describe thoughts with just one sentence, I would probably say this: "Thoughts are emotional webs of deep purposes whose magic guides the thinker into new dimensions of Life."