Muhammed

[APeacefulWarrior]

I think what bothers me about it is that it often seems to be talking from the perspective of the angels or the Creator and they are the ones talking about punishment, believers and unbelievers, but in my experience with angels they would never say such things so I wonder if these are fallen angels who have given the Quran.

That wouldn't really be consistent with what Ra said in 2.2, tho. At least, if the Quran were the product of negative teachings, I cannot imagine why he'd bring it up in that context. Also, the first parts of the Quran were said to be originally dictated by one of the arch-angels. (Gabriel, iirc.) Which I'd presume means a 5D or even 6D contact, rather than 4D. But later on, Mohammed started more freely composing them in his own room, without going to meditate on the mountain and such. So extrapolating greatly, I'd suggest that the enterprise may have begun as a passive channeling and later became an active one. (like the shift from Ra to Q'uo)

Frankly, I really wish that someone had followed-up on that one, rather than focusing on Jesus. Learning Ra's perspective on some of the other great prophets/teachers would have been really nice. I'm also really curious about the tale of Prince Arjuna's meeting with Krishna, for that matter.

If I get bored in the next few days, I might look up a list of the original transmission order of the Sura and work out which ones were before\after Mohammed stopped going up the mountain. It'd be interesting to see if the tone changed, although since I'd be working with translations it might be hard to tell. My basic hypothesis would be that the early Sura would focus on philosophy, cosmology, and the nature of God -stuff a 5D or 6D would want to talk about- whereas the later ones would be more earthly or control-based because of Mohammed having to adapt the teachings to fit his political situation.