Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100

    Thread: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100


    anagogy Away

    ἀναγωγή
    Posts: 2,775
    Threads: 42
    Joined: Jun 2009
    #62
    07-04-2014, 09:53 PM
    (07-04-2014, 01:53 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Does not every person contain the creator according to Ra? Are we not all things?

    Is not every person a container of the creator and all?

    Consciousness is the container for all existence. A self is a focus of consciousness. A self is a perspective, with certain boundaries of existence, or definition. Beingness goes beyond perspective as we understand it. It is the container for perspectives.

    Now, it is true we are really consciousness, but to call that a self feels improper to me, as there is no identification in that unified essence. A self identifies with specific attributes and projects inwards those attributes felt to be of itself and projects outwards those attributes felt not to be of self, because it is distorted light. The Beingness of the 8th density does not as I understand it (7th density is close to this as well).

    When you try to make that Beingness into a "self", you attempt to build ownership, ego, identification, and projection into the infinite. I'm just trying to tell you that there is no sense of ownership in that essence, or a conscious sense of self referential awareness. Just awareness of infinite potential.
    [+] The following 4 members thanked thanked anagogy for this post:4 members thanked anagogy for this post
      • Spaced, reeay, sunnysideup, BrownEye
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:35 PM
    RE: Convince me that polarizing and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:37 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:41 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:45 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:50 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 05:53 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:58 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:01 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:09 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:12 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:16 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:19 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:21 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-02-2014, 06:27 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by reeay - 07-02-2014, 06:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by michael430 - 07-02-2014, 06:53 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 07:01 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by michael430 - 07-02-2014, 07:14 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 07:18 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness - by xise - 07-02-2014, 08:28 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by GentleReckoning - 07-03-2014, 02:23 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 08:38 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by native - 07-02-2014, 09:42 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 10:38 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-02-2014, 11:30 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-03-2014, 12:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 11:56 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-03-2014, 12:14 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 12:21 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-03-2014, 12:35 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 12:39 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:19 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:21 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:44 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 01:09 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by xise - 07-03-2014, 01:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 01:49 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 09:02 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 04:34 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Hotsizzle77 - 07-03-2014, 07:15 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Karl - 07-03-2014, 09:18 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Phoenix - 07-03-2014, 09:36 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-03-2014, 03:15 PM
    Polarization - by anagogy - 07-03-2014, 03:40 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 11:51 PM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 12:31 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 12:53 AM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 01:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 01:53 AM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 09:53 PM
    RE: - by BrownEye - 07-04-2014, 11:25 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-04-2014, 05:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 06:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-04-2014, 09:54 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 09:57 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Bring4th_Austin - 07-04-2014, 03:50 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness - by native - 07-04-2014, 03:30 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by ChickenInSpace - 07-04-2014, 03:42 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by reeay - 07-04-2014, 05:23 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - by Horuseus - 07-04-2014, 05:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-04-2014, 05:51 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - by Horuseus - 07-04-2014, 06:10 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-05-2014, 12:13 AM
    identity - by anagogy - 07-05-2014, 01:31 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-05-2014, 01:32 AM
    identity - by anagogy - 07-05-2014, 01:44 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:00 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:02 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Lorna - 07-06-2014, 07:32 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2014, 08:15 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode