Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100

    Thread: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100


    GentleReckoning (Offline)

    Death, the primal Alchemist
    Posts: 1,383
    Threads: 68
    Joined: Oct 2012
    #43
    07-03-2014, 02:23 PM
    (07-02-2014, 08:28 PM)xise Wrote: Not interested in the money.

    Quote:82.21 ▶ Questioner: Then even though, from our point of view, there was great evolutionary experience it was deemed at some point by the evolving Logos that an experiment to create a greater experience was appropriate. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct and may benefit from comment. The Logos is aware of the nature of the third-density requirement for what you have called graduation. All the previous, if you would use this term, experiments, although resulting in many experiences, lacked what was considered the crucial ingredient; that is, polarization. There was little enough tendency for experience to polarize entities that entities repeated habitually the third-density cycles many times over. It was desired that the potential for polarization be made more available.

    82.22 ▶ Questioner: Then since the only possibility at this particular time, as I see it, was a polarization for service to others, I must assume from what you said that even though all were aware of this service-to-others necessity they were unable to achieve it. What was the configuration of mind of the mind/body/spirit complexes at that time? Were they aware of the necessity for the polarization or unaware of it? And if so, why did they have such a difficult time serving others to the extent necessary for graduation since this was the only polarity possible?

    Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, the tendency of those who are divinely happy, as you call this distortion, to have little urge to alter or better their condition. Such is the result of the mind/body/spirit which is not complex. There is the possibility of love of other-selves and service to other-selves, but there is the overwhelming awareness of the Creator in the self. The connection with the Creator is that of the umbilical cord. The security is total. Therefore, no love is terribly important; no pain terribly frightening; no effort, therefore, is made to serve for love or to benefit from fear.

    Positive polarization isn't all about happiness.

    I'm actually working on that through video games. I met a an old friend in MN that worked 20-30 hours a week, had his small social network and played video games. He was in now way successful, but he simply radiated content. Being around him made me feel as though he was an aspect of the bhudda so simple was his life. I felt more at peace just being around him.

    I feel it's a useful skill to develop. Complete contentedness through simple catalyst.
    [+] The following 2 members thanked thanked GentleReckoning for this post:2 members thanked GentleReckoning for this post
      • xise, isis
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread:



    Messages In This Thread
    Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:35 PM
    RE: Convince me that polarizing and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:37 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:41 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:45 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:50 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 05:53 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:58 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:01 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:09 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:12 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:16 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:19 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:21 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-02-2014, 06:27 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by reeay - 07-02-2014, 06:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by michael430 - 07-02-2014, 06:53 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 07:01 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by michael430 - 07-02-2014, 07:14 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 07:18 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness - by xise - 07-02-2014, 08:28 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by GentleReckoning - 07-03-2014, 02:23 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 08:38 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by native - 07-02-2014, 09:42 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 10:38 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-02-2014, 11:30 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-03-2014, 12:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 11:56 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-03-2014, 12:14 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 12:21 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-03-2014, 12:35 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 12:39 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:19 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:21 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:44 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 01:09 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by xise - 07-03-2014, 01:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 01:49 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 09:02 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 04:34 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Hotsizzle77 - 07-03-2014, 07:15 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Karl - 07-03-2014, 09:18 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Phoenix - 07-03-2014, 09:36 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-03-2014, 03:15 PM
    Polarization - by anagogy - 07-03-2014, 03:40 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 11:51 PM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 12:31 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 12:53 AM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 01:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 01:53 AM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 09:53 PM
    RE: - by BrownEye - 07-04-2014, 11:25 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-04-2014, 05:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 06:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-04-2014, 09:54 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 09:57 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Bring4th_Austin - 07-04-2014, 03:50 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness - by native - 07-04-2014, 03:30 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by ChickenInSpace - 07-04-2014, 03:42 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by reeay - 07-04-2014, 05:23 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - by Horuseus - 07-04-2014, 05:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-04-2014, 05:51 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - by Horuseus - 07-04-2014, 06:10 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-05-2014, 12:13 AM
    identity - by anagogy - 07-05-2014, 01:31 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-05-2014, 01:32 AM
    identity - by anagogy - 07-05-2014, 01:44 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:00 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:02 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Lorna - 07-06-2014, 07:32 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2014, 08:15 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode