Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100

[vervex]

I will send $100 to the person that convinces me that positive polarization and balancing is not about satisfaction and feeling happiness with everything that occurs and can occur, in other words, not about simply being at peace and happy. Additionally, you will have to convince me that serving the desires of others is not a natural act that comes from accepting all things.

I was going to offer an opinion but before I do so, I would like to clarify the following:
What is positive polarization, and how is it performed?
What is balancing, and how is it performed?

Different people here have shared and attributed different results and different meanings to those two practices, but I'd like to know, as objectively as possible, what do they actually consist of, regardless of the debated "end goal"?

$100 of Vervex's money?

Oh no! My money isn't leaving my wallet!
This is a silly bet in my opinion; there is no need for such monetary incentive as people here inherently share their thoughts freely. Besides, Immanuel can't afford to throw money by the windows nowadays. So, consider this wager most likely improbable, as if anyone "convinces" him, I'll steal his cash and hide it somewhere hehe