Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100

[Spaced]

I am going to respond to everything said so far in a very detailed manner.

I have one question: Why is not happiness/satisfaction the purpose of existence?

---

Not interested in the money.

82.21 ▶ Questioner: Then even though, from our point of view, there was great evolutionary experience it was deemed at some point by the evolving Logos that an experiment to create a greater experience was appropriate. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct and may benefit from comment. The Logos is aware of the nature of the third-density requirement for what you have called graduation. All the previous, if you would use this term, experiments, although resulting in many experiences, lacked what was considered the crucial ingredient; that is, polarization. There was little enough tendency for experience to polarize entities that entities repeated habitually the third-density cycles many times over. It was desired that the potential for polarization be made more available.

82.22 ▶ Questioner: Then since the only possibility at this particular time, as I see it, was a polarization for service to others, I must assume from what you said that even though all were aware of this service-to-others necessity they were unable to achieve it. What was the configuration of mind of the mind/body/spirit complexes at that time? Were they aware of the necessity for the polarization or unaware of it? And if so, why did they have such a difficult time serving others to the extent necessary for graduation since this was the only polarity possible?

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, the tendency of those who are divinely happy, as you call this distortion, to have little urge to alter or better their condition. Such is the result of the mind/body/spirit which is not complex. There is the possibility of love of other-selves and service to other-selves, but there is the overwhelming awareness of the Creator in the self. The connection with the Creator is that of the umbilical cord. The security is total. Therefore, no love is terribly important; no pain terribly frightening; no effort, therefore, is made to serve for love or to benefit from fear.

Positive polarization isn't all about happiness.

Why would one serve for love? How does one benefit from fear? Towards what final end? Ra does not at all state that happiness is not the goal here.

The quote is saying that if one seeks happiness above all else it leads to stagnation and stifles the polarization process. The ends to which one would serve love or seek to benefit from hate is to serve the creator, not to find happiness but because the nature of polarized entities is service.

---

I don't know why I'm bothering, you obviously will never be convinced of anything unless you want to and given the stance you've taken it's plain to see you don't.