11-28-2013, 03:52 PM
I do not think there are "good people" and "bad people", there is only the geometry of desires between individuals. Some are parallel, others are perpendicular, each angle of associating creating a different kind of spin and energetic interaction.
I also do not believe that "good people" have never done anything throughout their existence to create karma, so examining "fairness" through the lense of only a singular life will likely yield the appearance of injustice. However, not every occurrence stems merely from energy patterns developed in this life, but through patterns and habits developed throughout time.
In this case, I think the "blame game" is what becomes the cycle of abuse which causes suffering to arise from "bad experiences". Cruelty, arrogance, vengeance, sadism, etc, all of these things stem from pain or suffering within the individual. Yes, some people "like" that fact, and so feed it.
My point here is that the whole moral argument is in some capacity or other merely a "blame game". I think it is important to remember, however, that many such games are played throughout life and it is often quite difficult to avoid.
Philosophy is dead without practice and engagement. The mind can conjecture endlessly but that does not mean the actions of the body will follow. Morals are especially as such. One can discuss or think about the concept of morals or the lack thereof forever, but what really counts is how one chooses to live their life.
I would also add that for every extreme example of a negative entity you may think of there will also be an equal and opposite positive example. For example, there are entities which can actually reintegrate a soul which has been disintegrated. There are also entities capable of protecting a soul from disintegrating.
Just as there are cases of injustice, there are also cases of justice and instances where everything does work out evenly. In fact, imo, the greatest injustice would be the disallowance of injustice because free will means an individual can choose unjust actions. So, really, I think both justice and injustice exist and it is through that that justice as a spectrum exists in the universe as part of the choosing of entities. It may seem contradictory but I think justice in the universe is there through free will, which means that injustice can be chosen and that is just.
That being said, there is ever and always the choice. It doesn't matter what you choose to label your actions, what is important is what you are actually doing and the interactions that stem from that. So, imo, there is nothing to fight, there is nothing to "be rid of", there is only the acceptance of choice, of free will, or not.
I also do not believe that "good people" have never done anything throughout their existence to create karma, so examining "fairness" through the lense of only a singular life will likely yield the appearance of injustice. However, not every occurrence stems merely from energy patterns developed in this life, but through patterns and habits developed throughout time.
In this case, I think the "blame game" is what becomes the cycle of abuse which causes suffering to arise from "bad experiences". Cruelty, arrogance, vengeance, sadism, etc, all of these things stem from pain or suffering within the individual. Yes, some people "like" that fact, and so feed it.
My point here is that the whole moral argument is in some capacity or other merely a "blame game". I think it is important to remember, however, that many such games are played throughout life and it is often quite difficult to avoid.
Philosophy is dead without practice and engagement. The mind can conjecture endlessly but that does not mean the actions of the body will follow. Morals are especially as such. One can discuss or think about the concept of morals or the lack thereof forever, but what really counts is how one chooses to live their life.
I would also add that for every extreme example of a negative entity you may think of there will also be an equal and opposite positive example. For example, there are entities which can actually reintegrate a soul which has been disintegrated. There are also entities capable of protecting a soul from disintegrating.
Just as there are cases of injustice, there are also cases of justice and instances where everything does work out evenly. In fact, imo, the greatest injustice would be the disallowance of injustice because free will means an individual can choose unjust actions. So, really, I think both justice and injustice exist and it is through that that justice as a spectrum exists in the universe as part of the choosing of entities. It may seem contradictory but I think justice in the universe is there through free will, which means that injustice can be chosen and that is just.
That being said, there is ever and always the choice. It doesn't matter what you choose to label your actions, what is important is what you are actually doing and the interactions that stem from that. So, imo, there is nothing to fight, there is nothing to "be rid of", there is only the acceptance of choice, of free will, or not.