Basis of Ra Material Interpretation and Focus of Law of One Study

[Shin'Ar]

Exactly, the balance between the extremes is the one extreme, the other extreme is lacking balance between the extremes focus/lackfocus You refer to the one extreme (middle path) purely as the whole thing, which it is, but only because it is a beam looked at as spot. If you can construct the logic around the core i'm referring to here you may be able to track my reference without being, well, over the top direct about it

No, I would see the extremes be at the far ends of the seesaw. The fulcrum is found at the center upon which the seesaw balances. You seem to be suggesting that the extreme of imbalance is at the center, and I'm sorry but that just doesn't make sense to me.

Imbalance only comes when reaching states far to either end are experienced. It is in the Middle where balance becomes closer to being realized. That would not be an extreme or a path at all. It is simply the center point between the two paths.

Experiencing this world, it would be NOT impossible to experience both paths, or STS and STO, and the quickest path to higher light being is tending toward the left hand teachings simply because one is freed from the deceiving and manipulating teachings of the right hand, becoming enabled to learn and grasp truth more quickly.

I am glad you posted this Cyan, as I see a mistake I made in leaving out a small word that completely changes the meaning I intended. I put that word in bold where it should have been placed.

Why do you feel the system around you is manipulating you in a deceiving way?

I think its manipulations are simple and fundementally working for the system itself that is to say, logical for them. The fact that I may have, at times, trouble understanding the complexity of why it is logical for them, doesnt mean that they are trying to deceive or manipulate, only that I dont get why in their view it is better to work without being my ally. Then I can convince them that being my ally is better than being my enemy and thus gain a new ally. Thats why To me, the logical question is, why do you feel the system is manipulating you, instead of seeing it as a opportunity to ask, why do some operators within the system not consider you their ally and let you in on why they do what they do.

The deception is in the teaching that their way is the way to salvation, and that the individual is not God, but must worship God according to their doctrines, using them as the middle man to intercede for them.

I think both are found on both paths. As you noted, it is simply the extremes of either that create the problems of imbalance. Tendencies toward one or the other if not extreme should probably not be defined or designated as their extremes.

I noted that it creates imbalance, i never note that it is a problem, people read that it is a problem into it, i not taht MY imbalance is a problem TO ME but imbalance in itself is NOT a problem.

Is a problem not a problem regardless of who it is a problem for?

When we are balanced near center those extremes should not be what define us.

Agreed

It seems that your supposition that the middle point of balance is an extremity will keep us from coming to any agreement.

but a great majority want to progress along the right hand path to the very very end of the road, and then have a quick jump to the left right as they end the game.

But I think if everyone was left hand, there would be just as little choice as there is if everyone was right hand.

I think that the progression on either path is not made in a sudden leap.

Agreed, but progression (accumulated wisdom) need not become active (applicated wisdom) until required (at the end). Isnt that the logic that these people would undertake?

[/quote]

No, this is based on your interpreting the right hand path as the path to enlightenment, whereas I see it as the opposite. Also I have already pointed out that Left Hand teaching does not acknowledge an end.

What you are proposing is the mistaken thinking that there is an already concluded future. Only in that premise could all reach an end level of evolution process.

I seem to see you doing the same like 4 lines up.

Sorry you lost me here. What line are you referring to?

The Left hand Path teaches that Infinity has no end and continues as Mystery. So your proposal would never come to be anyway.

Eeeeeexactly. Douglas Adams anyone? If the reference is too thick, then hitchikers guide to the galaxy, douglas adams, what happens when someone finds out the answer to the universe.

???????????????

I am sensing that you are aware of much of this already, where you are in a Luciferian cult. Whether satanic or not, most Luciferian teachings would teach Left Hand doctrine. So I think that maybe you are more testing to see how accurate I am in my profession, or comparing it to what your cult teaches.

Luciferians don't teach, they reflect what you want are in that situation, thats their point, non shining being the point, remember. Minimum required effort to move, as opposed to the self flagellating maximum teaching (input into the system of false selves) of Christians.

I'm actually comparing you to you. And seeing how much you change as I change and using that to calculate my interior change, if you must know, as to what I'm studying on the interior its trying to figure out how to guide people into and out of "schizophrenia" and I've come to the conclusion that its essentially a state that only becomes possible if you lie. Its that simple .

Interesting conclusion.

Were christians more prone to letting others do what they want and helping them in times of need, I'd probably be in a christian cult. Probably something reformed or protestant. Probably just one of those really big ones with dozens of millions of cultists.

Getting through to the cultists stuff yet? So far I've yet to see anything being taught except others showing me when I lie.

Yep, it sounds as though you are just looking for fellowship in places that appeal to your interests and way of thinking. Nothing wrong with that at all.

---

Do you know what set of cards Ra would be using as its example?

http://www.lawofone.info/links.php#tarot

Thanks Greek, and yes that is the deck that I use, although I must point out that it has gone through a few revisions where the images have changed somewhat, but for the most part, all are using the same symbology.