11-27-2013, 04:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-27-2013, 04:21 PM by godwide_void.)
BrownEye Wrote:Maybe it is simply the intent behind the creation of the book, and the fact that only those that are ready to learn what is within will find those answers. In my own learning periods I found that publicizing certain concepts on a public forum that many who are not ready would randomly read, seemed to be an infringement on certain levels. I could private message the info, but when posted publicly the harassment attempts would begin.
If one commits their endeavors to the Almighty, then the path ahead will typically venture into more tranquil and scenic routes. If arrogance, validation or the desire to flaunt ones supposed prowess to others in an attempt to intimidate or with the prejudice that others are "beneath you" are the predominant motivayors, and thus only you may show the way, dismissing the paths and peculiarities of others, rather than simply seeking to share knowledge for the betterment and empowerment of others, then difficulties will surely manifest which will obstruct effective fruition.
What certain concepts would you personally consider taboo or "unfit" for conceptual assimilation and exposure for others? Knowledge is not the exclusive right of a select few, for the template sustaining all knowledge and the scavenger of said knowledge are congruent. Cosmic laws are also set into place which ensure data and experiences vibrationally incompatible with a being or are at risk of being dangerously infringing or unnerving due to inadequate preparation or discipline will not manifest in the field of said being so as to avoid extreme infringement or imposition. Infractions of lesser severities do occur, of course, but these are engineered to occur as catalyst, thus some semblance of readiness or capacity to subsequently integrate were inherent.