12-22-2010, 05:47 AM
This is something I've been reflecting on for a while now and these are just my thoughts. I write them down to make it more clear to myself and hopefully you can help me to understand this better.
Before Ra material I always thought of - how nice it is going to die, because I thought that unity existed everywhere except on Earth. Even if there would be a lot of indifferencies in "heaven" we all would still be united, fulfilling different roles. It would be deepiest respect and love felt for everyone and everything.
Now, I discover that there is this unity I was thinking of, but it doesn't come until 6D. But I am not in 6D now! I am in 3D, and this is density of choice. So, regardless where I am going after this life (have had a strong feeling before I started to read Ra material that I am going home after this life, to the unity) I still live in this density, the density of choice. That means that I have to choose, that I have to polarize.
I understand all the concepts behind STO path and STS path, but still is somewhat reluctant to consciously make this choice on a deeper level. Not that I find STS path appealing, but the very choosing of one side is what makes me sick. What I feel is that I have to pick one side. The one that is good because the other one is bad.
Now, I know I must be confused about something, but I thought (prior to Ra material) that this density was about unity. That this density was about to trying to grasp and understand everybody, and if you can't you could at least try to respect them. I thought that this density was about peace, inner peace, where you trying to accept everything and everyone. And I thought that whenever you got that feeling such as I do (I am tired, replete, and it's time to go home) then you go home. Not that I have to do something, ie making that consious choice (picking side), before I can go home.
Now I know that STO is where I stand, but people/entities are all different and deserve respect. You can't present an idea/dream of unity and at the same time ask people to pick one side over another. There is no unity if you polarize in the context of something being better than something else. When you choosing one side, by polarising, you choose one side over another in the context of "us" and "them", and THAT I cannot do. Please, brothers and sisters, help me to understand it.
Before Ra material I always thought of - how nice it is going to die, because I thought that unity existed everywhere except on Earth. Even if there would be a lot of indifferencies in "heaven" we all would still be united, fulfilling different roles. It would be deepiest respect and love felt for everyone and everything.
Now, I discover that there is this unity I was thinking of, but it doesn't come until 6D. But I am not in 6D now! I am in 3D, and this is density of choice. So, regardless where I am going after this life (have had a strong feeling before I started to read Ra material that I am going home after this life, to the unity) I still live in this density, the density of choice. That means that I have to choose, that I have to polarize.
I understand all the concepts behind STO path and STS path, but still is somewhat reluctant to consciously make this choice on a deeper level. Not that I find STS path appealing, but the very choosing of one side is what makes me sick. What I feel is that I have to pick one side. The one that is good because the other one is bad.
Now, I know I must be confused about something, but I thought (prior to Ra material) that this density was about unity. That this density was about to trying to grasp and understand everybody, and if you can't you could at least try to respect them. I thought that this density was about peace, inner peace, where you trying to accept everything and everyone. And I thought that whenever you got that feeling such as I do (I am tired, replete, and it's time to go home) then you go home. Not that I have to do something, ie making that consious choice (picking side), before I can go home.
Now I know that STO is where I stand, but people/entities are all different and deserve respect. You can't present an idea/dream of unity and at the same time ask people to pick one side over another. There is no unity if you polarize in the context of something being better than something else. When you choosing one side, by polarising, you choose one side over another in the context of "us" and "them", and THAT I cannot do. Please, brothers and sisters, help me to understand it.