My post a few times ago thinking that perhaps the q'uo readings are kind of a 'next stage' I stand by that.

This website makes the readings usable for me, before this website, I just couldn't so much navigate through the quo readings.

http://thequochannelings.wordpress.com

This was an excerpt I read today (under the heading 'drive'):

When you choose a destination, you do not choose the route by which you shall arrive at that destination. For instance, this instrument chose, as a guiding lesson for her life, study upon how to love without expectation of return. This thematic lesson recurs again and again within a person’s life, just as it has recurred again and again in relationship after relationship for this instrument. When there was a challenge, a careful analysis of that challenge yielded the information that at the base of this challenge was the question, “Can you love without expecting a return in this relationship?”

 

Each entity moving into incarnation has one or more of these pivotal themes that recur. It is always very helpful for a seeker to gather intelligence upon what particular lessons your particular incarnation is offering you at an incarnational level. It is a great help to analyze the patterns of your incarnation until you see where the challenge lies, so that when it occurs you have a familiarity and a comfort with the fact that this question has arisen once again for you. There is no urgency about finding a particular solution. There is only the urgency of becoming conscious within the incarnational process of learning.

I started trying to do this work for myself.

It seems to me that where there is a group of people, (aside from close friends and family) there is a fundamental lack of acceptance as to who I am. Like, a subtly expressed, 'no that's not how you should be expressing yourself.' Very much like the group would prefer just a different human being in my place.

Sometimes I have overcome this with a lot of love and a little toughness; (the time I'm thinking of I was drinking frequently and applied this sort of information with an efficiency not necessarily respectful of myself.) Sometimes it is just 'there' and unmoveable, so subtle it can't be tackled, but clearly there because I'm not getting on with anyone. When the relationship ends, which it always does, it either happens to great anger or just with a quiet pop, never much warmth. But always with the mutual reality we will never see each other again.

I wrote a blog on channeling a few posts ago in which I explained why I never posted this reading. However, on re- reading it it seems to be saying the opposite to what I had thought.

I have had catalyst recently to calm down of some of these projected fears. I do not make claims as to its goodness. I am far from perfect, my diet for instance is not perfect. Although we are technically perfect anyway in Law of One terms.

Here it is:

I am Ra. We have difficulty with understanding most of what happens during your solar cycles that you call days. We hope that when it comes down to it, you are doing well in your endeavors and that there are few things hindering you. We understand that the difficulty that comes with following the service to others path. The difficulty that comes with superiority, inferiority and spiritual vibration. That you feel as having service to self entities on your plane that you cannot be secondary to another self and that you must be individual in need of your own defense. But we say to you, whatever abbhoration the service to self path has caused within your beings, will ultimately prove to be false. And that the truth if for one who is seeking the service to others path, are the truths that can be found in the world, in the visualised world, in the fictitous imagined world when all entities are service to others. But in a way even when there are false consciousness and that which is not, covering your plane, there is a large amount of service to others and there is far more than one of your entites might percieve in a single day.  Purely because the persuasions of fear, and there is always a little fear in persuasion. The persuasions of fear are alert and alive and you have to pay attention to them at all times. Or as the being feels. And so if you have a path where fear is something which you do not want in emotional relationships, is ever present, then how do you stop it being able to advertise itself with more efficiency than the service to others path. You cannot, that’s why wisdom must enter the third density experience.

Service to others is easy to hide. Perhaps more easily to hide than the service to self path sometimes. Because a service to others path does not seek to make itself known. Service to others parts of your being lie there, humble, awake and aware. Service to self parts of your being scream for attention and that’s what they do in your news services, and in your political discussions, and even in some of the more creative aspects that you would hope would be free from such fear. And the world is changing as it is, as you have surmised earlier in this day, we advise you to be more aware of the sudden intuitions that come because as we have just proved to you, as we have just correlated with you, they are sometimes far more powerful than you suspect. And the fears, the false insights, will be very quickly revealed for what they are if you just have love in the moment, and stay centered. This is all we have to offer at this time but we do hope we will return to you when some lessons have been applied.

We leave you now. In the light and love of the one infinite creator. Adonai.

As an aside I wonder about the 'creative aspects' talked about here. The fact is a lot of creative endeavors have negative things in them but that doesn't make them any less amazing, I wonder if there is a hinting quality to this in that wanting to be 'free from such fear' would make the creative aspect a little less interesting, and does that generalise to other areas?

When I first started this blog it was called 'the next stage'. A bit later I decided that, after the Law of One by Ra, what other stage could there be? So I added jokingly 'with added pretensiousness', and took out the write up I previously had and wrote a new, more eccentric one.

But I wonder now; I have only moved onwards recently, infact, I have moved onwards very quickly I think. I once found the quo readings not sticky enough to understand. I needed the hardness of the Law of One books. (using a kind of personal variation of the word 'hardness') But now the quo readings seem deeply meaningful and profound.

Recently there has been some sort of short circuit of my ability to blog or anything like that. I have simply seemed to have stopped producing that kind of energy.

It is as though the metaphysical work I have been doing has been so intense that I now have to start from the ground up, from laying aside something; some way of being or thinking.

So, there is a question I have kind of been asking myself for a very long time now.

We know the negative polarity exists, and we have an idea that the negative polarity is a kind of 'stranger' in the garden of the positive polarity.

How should the positive polarity then think and interact with the negative polarity?

Back to the Crucifixion of Esmerelda Sweetwater. Another metaphor is that the doppelganger for Esmerelda was taught the first lessons of the beginnings of the negative polarity by a philosophical lesson around eating meat.

But Carla, due a large part to advice from Ra, (I believe) does eat meat. This perhaps is another metaphor for the fact that there is something to be learned and gained from the negative polarity.

Recently, bizarrely, I have had knocking about in my mind the idea of enlightenment.

But how it got there, I don't know, because I've never really been interested in enlightenment.

And it seems to me to be the opposite of what my own guidance has been telling me through an article I wrote on this blog dated November 27th. Which talks about needing being engaged with the world.

Those two are the opposite for me. Enlightenment means shooting off into some mega higher consciousness.

I wanted to kind of 'dump', this information along the lines of the Law of One that I realise and then need to outlet.

A) At sometime later in the sessions. The Fifth Density friend of the Land of Conflict was having a kind of crisis because it's foray into wisdom was unsuccessful. This lead me to the conclusion through a few different thoughts that the negative polarity must dominate everything that enters its experience. Thereby 'winning' and taking the others energy through fear. If it does not do this and does not dominate, then the inevitable conclusion that is not avoidable is that it's behaviour are 'wrong' (not the entire world) and that the way of service to others is correct, or at least that the intended service to others entities are worthy; because the negative polarity sees the winner as correct.

This being too much of a loving fact. The negative polarity falls into crisis.

B) The Law of Free Will is experienced in different ways by the positive and negative polarity. This is much like the real law. The positive will strive for the best justice in the situation. The negative will take advantage of a stated law and hold others to it for it's own gain.

The positive polarity understands the law of free will that entities must come to their own conclusions and have the right to. Even if it means going off to the negative polarity. The negative polarity will take advantage of a technical use of free will that doesn't go with the heart. Such as politically you have elected officials, free will taken care off. Now lets pass laws that the populace wouldn't directly agree with.

C) This relates more to the material world and David Wilcock. (If you are not familiar with DW's statements, I am not going to explain them).

Perhaps the reason societal change happens slow is free will of the populace. For instance, change seems to be happening slowly through laws being changed and then from that arrests being made, is that the population has agreed with those laws.

If certain people just die, or are arrested not in accord with agreed upon laws, and the society is thus changed; is that a violation of free will? Which might be why also the negative polarity works so slowly to change things.

Neither side might know these rules. Or they may. I am not sure about the example C, but it is an interesting application. It shows strongly how the Law of Free Will is simply a law that takes no sides.

Good luck people!