08-02-2012, 09:17 AM
Austin is correct, of course. One does not need to be 'well-read' on the general subject without it becoming blatently obvious that channelers (and hyper-intuitives) repeatedly do the same thing with each others work (either consciously or unconsciously), although some are inevitably more 'conceptually seminal' than others. Take a look at the body of material (merely from L/L Research) that was pre-contemporary and contemporary with the 'Gateway Program'.
Theosophy
http://www.llresearch.org/origins/ct/tra..._0205.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0201.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._1004.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/origins/ct/tra..._0205.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0617.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is...ook_1.aspx
You will find that the info does evolve/devolve, often in the same way that 'chinese whispers' evolve - whatever is found to be suitable for digestion of the audience - for better or worse.
Theosophy
http://www.llresearch.org/origins/ct/tra..._0205.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0201.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._1004.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/origins/ct/tra..._0205.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0617.aspx
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is...ook_1.aspx
You will find that the info does evolve/devolve, often in the same way that 'chinese whispers' evolve - whatever is found to be suitable for digestion of the audience - for better or worse.