Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" (/showthread.php?tid=5292) |
Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - anagogy - 08-01-2012 Has anyone read this book? How does this relate to the Law of One, you ask? Here is an excerpt from the book. To give you some context, Monroe had a sort of "Gate-Way" program going on at the Monroe Institute (thought it wasn't called the Monroe Institute back then) where they taught people to enter deeper levels of consciousness and occasionally have out of body projections. Sometimes, beings would channel through the participants. The excerpt I'm showing you is one of those channelings. As you read it, ask yourself, where have I heard this before? I apologize for the weird formatting. Quote:Other Voice: "I apologize for being so late, but I need to thank you and to Sound familiar? Seems this being is describing the densities of our octave, with some of the vibrational sub levels of seven inbetween. Isn't that interesting? RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - zenmaster - 08-01-2012 I'm positive Monroe had read the Ra Material. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - Eddie - 08-01-2012 (08-01-2012, 09:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: I'm positive Monroe had read the Ra Material. Maybe, but most of this stuff happened to Robert Monroe between the early 1950s and the mid 1970s, years before the Ra material was published. Far Journeys is copyrighted 1985. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - zenmaster - 08-01-2012 It was copyrighted in 85 not 82 as you claimed. Monroe's last 3 books are only loosely biographical. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - anagogy - 08-01-2012 (08-01-2012, 10:35 AM)Eddie Wrote:(08-01-2012, 09:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: I'm positive Monroe had read the Ra Material. That's correct. Though the book was published in 1985, this stuff was supposed to have happened much much earlier. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - zenmaster - 08-01-2012 No it wasn't supposed to have happened much earlier. It was derived from notes taken after the institute moved, after '79... RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - anagogy - 08-01-2012 (08-01-2012, 03:07 PM)zenmaster Wrote: No it wasn't supposed to have happened much earlier. It was derived from notes taken after the institute moved, after '79... On page 45 Monroe states it took place in the mid seventies. I suppose you can always make the claim Monroe is a dirty liar. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - zenmaster - 08-01-2012 (08-01-2012, 11:05 PM)anagogy Wrote:You must have a different copy.(08-01-2012, 03:07 PM)zenmaster Wrote: No it wasn't supposed to have happened much earlier. It was derived from notes taken after the institute moved, after '79... You must be referring to page 39, when he relates notes from one of the preliminary sessions, starting at '74, where they began to meet 'advanced intelligent beings' and what that was like. Take another look at the timeline, if you care to do so. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - anagogy - 08-02-2012 (08-01-2012, 11:50 PM)zenmaster Wrote: You must be referring to page 39, when he relates notes from one of the preliminary sessions, starting at '74, where they began to meet 'advanced intelligent beings' and what that was like. Take another look at the timeline, if you care to do so. Well, the particular copy I was using was a pdf file, so the page numbering may be different due to format. Incidentally, I also have a physical copy, and the first mention of the gateway project is on page 26, where he nonspecifically refers to "mid-seventies". You are correct, that on page 39, they do specifically mention 1974 in reference to the explorer team. But why look at the timeline again? '74 falls well within the definition of "mid seventies". Let's pretend you're right, and that was just the beginning of their "non-physical contacts". Even still, it could have been all the way up to '84, since that was when volume one of the Ra material was published (I mean if the whole reason we are talking about this is because of the possibility that Robert Monroe (a) read this and (b) decided to fabricate a story about people channeling beings that just happens to corroborate the densities concept offered by Ra.) I suppose if one were really motivated they could contact the Monroe Institute and find out for sure when that particular session took place. Might be worth it. Perhaps some day I will develop the motivation to do so. Would be an interesting fact to know. At present, I'm not terribly concerned about it. As I've stated before, I don't personally think the man was a liar. Each to their own, I suppose. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - Sagittarius - 08-02-2012 (08-01-2012, 09:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: I'm positive Monroe had read the Ra Material. This matters why ? RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - anagogy - 08-02-2012 (08-02-2012, 01:54 AM)Sagittarius Wrote: This matters why ? He thinks Monroe fabricated it. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - Bring4th_Austin - 08-02-2012 It doesn't necessarily have to imply fabrication. Once anything is experienced by the consciousness, it is freely available within the unconscious, which is where the mind draws upon for channeling and things of this nature. If the participants in these sessions had been exposed to the Ra material then the information they offer, whether in a conscious state or not, can't really be used to corroborate the material. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - zenmaster - 08-02-2012 Austin is correct, of course. One does not need to be 'well-read' on the general subject without it becoming blatently obvious that channelers (and hyper-intuitives) repeatedly do the same thing with each others work (either consciously or unconsciously), although some are inevitably more 'conceptually seminal' than others. Take a look at the body of material (merely from L/L Research) that was pre-contemporary and contemporary with the 'Gateway Program'. Theosophy http://www.llresearch.org/origins/ct/transcripts/1971_0205.aspx http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/1974/1974_0201.aspx http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/1974/1974_1004.aspx http://www.llresearch.org/origins/ct/transcripts/1977_0205.aspx http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/1979/1979_0617.aspx http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/1981/1981_0131_book_1.aspx You will find that the info does evolve/devolve, often in the same way that 'chinese whispers' evolve - whatever is found to be suitable for digestion of the audience - for better or worse. RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - Sagittarius - 08-02-2012 (08-02-2012, 09:17 AM)zenmaster Wrote: Austin is correct, of course. One does not need to be 'well-read' on the general subject without it becoming blatently obvious that channelers (and hyper-intuitives) repeatedly do the same thing with each others work (either consciously or unconsciously), although some are inevitably more 'conceptually seminal' than others. Take a look at the body of material (merely from L/L Research) that was pre-contemporary and contemporary with the 'Gateway Program'. I get that I just fail to see why it matters. I mean isn't that the nature of existence, constant building on-top and below-of from different angles and views. Is that not the oneness we seek? Sorry perhaps I'am just assuming what your meaning is by your statement. Do you think that matters Zen ? RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - zenmaster - 08-02-2012 (08-02-2012, 10:03 AM)Sagittarius Wrote: Sorry perhaps I'am just assuming what your meaning is by your statement.Ok, what it is you are assuming that I mean? RE: Robert Monroe "Far Journeys" - Sagittarius - 08-03-2012 (08-02-2012, 08:29 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(08-02-2012, 10:03 AM)Sagittarius Wrote: Sorry perhaps I'am just assuming what your meaning is by your statement.Ok, what it is you are assuming that I mean? On second thought the confusion is my own, no explanation required. |