01-22-2009, 07:06 PM
(01-15-2009, 01:25 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: I've found numerous such conflicts in reading the Q'uo sessions related to the Time Lateral. Still, I believe that there is a baby in the bathwater. My interpretation is that the time lateral is equivalent to the quarantine discussed by Ra, or more accurately, it is the imlementation thereof. Given this interpretation, there was no human existence on the non-time lateraled Earth. So we needn't worry about somehow meeting up with other 3D being that evolved there.
Just my 2 cents,
3D Sunset
As for the incongruous statements concerning time made by Ra & Q'uo and others I have to smile every time I encounter one. For example, I know exactly what time it was that I made a particular call or performed some particular act but if I tried to relate to someone in India or Australia what time it was there when I made the call or performed the particular act for me it would very difficult. Although I could eventually do it, most often I will do as I have done in the past and got it a little off. So when I see what is seemly conflicting references in time I try not to let the specific time reference play much of a role as I believe it is the information itself that is trying to be conveyed that is important.
In this case it is the fact that Earth was placed on a Time Lateral and not necessarily when that placement occurred that is important. This Time Lateral is an alternate way to get from here to there. If we had been left on the original Time Track we would have been available for further contact by various outsources which could have introduced distortions that would have hindered our ability to awaken to making the choice. By quarantining us we were left with only the contact from our own inner planes which of course is populated to a great degree by entities that are a part of Earth's 3D journey.
When they speak of us rejoining the original time track they aren't necessarily meaning there will be entities coming "back on line". If you envision a railroad track that has a switch. When the switch is set to one position the train will go onto a set of tracks that will go onto a route that will go around behind a set of mountains that lie in the middle between the two tracks and if it goes on the other it will go around the other side of the mountains. Both set of tracks in this case would eventually meet up again on the other side of the mountains. Just because the switch is thrown and we took a different route doesn't mean the train was split in half and part went one way and part went the other. It merely means that it was diverted onto a different set of tracks.
So there you have it for what its worth--my view in a nutshell of both Time Lateral and time reference incongruity.