03-09-2012, 06:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2012, 06:17 PM by Bring4th_Austin.)
(03-09-2012, 05:41 PM)plenum Wrote: I don't regard them as my 'enemy', but rather I am unable to assimilate what their have to offer, that is, enslavement. And so this inability to extend Universal Love and Acceptance in this particular situation leads to a slight loss of polarization in both sides.
I share your inability to understand this as well, but I don't struggle with it. The STS entity views their enslavement as the Creator's love, and if an STO entity accepts that love, their freewill is jeopardized. The choice of protection is simple to me, even though Ra hinted that it is one that is eventually abandoned at some point in the STO path:
Quote:33.11
Questioner: This motion picture brought out the point about which we have been talking. The Colonel had to make a decision. I was wondering about his polarization. He could have knuckled under, you might say, to the negative forces, but he chose to defend his friend instead. Is it possible for you to estimate which is more positively polarizing: to defend the positively oriented entity, or to allow suppression by the negatively oriented entities?
Ra: I am Ra. This question takes in the scope of fourth-density as well as your own and its answer may best be seen by the action of the entity called Jehoshuah, which you call Jesus. This entity was to be defended by its friends. The entity reminded its friends to put away the sword. This entity then delivered itself to be put to the physical death. The impulse to protect the loved other-self is one which persists through the fourth-density, a density abounding in compassion. More than this we cannot and need not say.
We know that, after this act, Jesus then graduated to 5th density (originally entering incarnation as a 4D entity).
I cannot imagine not protecting someone who cannot protect themselves, or my dearest loved ones, or myself in any situation which may cause them suffering. But I am okay with this.
I cannot accept the love of the STS entity through enslavement because that would ultimately inhibit my own choice to share love myself. I don't view the attempt at enslavement as an attack, but rather as an offering of love as the STS entity understands it, and if there is a loss of polarization because of this, so be it...I don't care much for the intricacies of polarization, though I'd imagine being enslaved would inhibit my ability to polarize further if that were my desire.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.