01-04-2012, 04:55 AM
The writer was basically debunking anything he could lay his hands on. Although I must admit to being alarmed at the products available to the public to enable large scale hoaxing; intentionally or not.
Some trite reasons were given for UFOs (getting bored of the missile excuse.....). And to the lucid of mind a floating balloon/lantern cannot equate to the intelligent movement of a craft.
It would have been a nice balance if he'd included some pics of UFOs that experts agree are intelligent craft/thoughtforms. The myriad examples of these easily procurable to someone actively researching the topic.
Having seen numerous UFOs that defied the laws of gravity (my memory of a bright, opaque and fluorescent orange ball 5x the size of the moon, bouncing in the sky like a basketball then stopping suddenly and dematerialising slowly comes sharply to mind) I prefer to see a mixture of the 'proven' legitimate photographs and the hoaxers versions. Definitely helps with one's future discernment.
For those of us who have photographed orbs moving the powder thesis was flimsy. Again there is vast research available on these interesting apparitions.
The Norway spiral continues to have question marks all over it. Intuition tells me it's definitely NOT related to man made ballistics. However with all the disinformation surrounding this topic I haven't made up my mind. But it does have the positive aspect of keeping one on the search for the truth.
Unfortunately I think a huge side-effect of his theories will be to put the brakes on those just beginning their search for truth and understanding.
Basically I would question his motives for the thread.
Some trite reasons were given for UFOs (getting bored of the missile excuse.....). And to the lucid of mind a floating balloon/lantern cannot equate to the intelligent movement of a craft.
It would have been a nice balance if he'd included some pics of UFOs that experts agree are intelligent craft/thoughtforms. The myriad examples of these easily procurable to someone actively researching the topic.
Having seen numerous UFOs that defied the laws of gravity (my memory of a bright, opaque and fluorescent orange ball 5x the size of the moon, bouncing in the sky like a basketball then stopping suddenly and dematerialising slowly comes sharply to mind) I prefer to see a mixture of the 'proven' legitimate photographs and the hoaxers versions. Definitely helps with one's future discernment.
For those of us who have photographed orbs moving the powder thesis was flimsy. Again there is vast research available on these interesting apparitions.
The Norway spiral continues to have question marks all over it. Intuition tells me it's definitely NOT related to man made ballistics. However with all the disinformation surrounding this topic I haven't made up my mind. But it does have the positive aspect of keeping one on the search for the truth.
Unfortunately I think a huge side-effect of his theories will be to put the brakes on those just beginning their search for truth and understanding.
Basically I would question his motives for the thread.