01-07-2009, 04:14 AM
Jim Kent Wrote:Firstly, the term "Intelligent Infinity"...I would direct you to this link where it was asked to be defined. Here is a snippet from the page..
Quote:Questioner: It is not necessary to divide it. The definition of intelligent infinity is sufficient. Could you define that please?
Ra: I am Ra. This is exponentially simpler and less confusing. There is unity. This unity is all that there is. This unity has a potential and kinetic. The potential is intelligent infinity. Tapping this potential will yield work. This work has been called by us, intelligent energy.
The nature of this work is dependent upon the particular distortion of free will which in turn is the nature of a particular intelligent energy of kinetic focus of the potential of unity or that which is all.
Jim Kent Wrote:Secondly, the term "Logos"...From this Q'uo channeling (Link) I submit this quote.
Quote:K: I would like to clarify. Was there a single Logos
that created the multiple Logoi of which you speak
to make the Big Bang theory of the universe? Is the
Big Bang theory correct, and what the Creator used
to make the creation?
I am Q’uo, and am aware of your query, my brother.
We would suggest that this one Logos was indeed
the one Creator who then created the infinite
number of Logoi that you may see in your night sky
as a representation of infinity. Each Logos, then, has
a various strength or capacity for creation, some
having created a solar system, others having created
an entire galaxy, each being one of an infinite
number of Logoi.
Hope this helps some!