Do negtive entities get karma

[unity100]

I understand balancing to be the process of discovering the completeness within the self and then accepting and internalizing that. As far as i understand it, it has nothing to do with how the entity is outwardly manifested, or any actions; because the entity
will still have it's predilections towards distortions of being patient, cheerful, open, courteous, etc.. or the opposite.

the existence is not that 'internal'. had it been that internal, there would be no need for there to be more than one entity. (finite). everything doesnt depend on self. there are others too. to illustrate, 4d and 6d harvests are strictly society complex nature. doesnt matter how much you balance, how much you internalize in 6d. you will still need all the others in your complex to be ready.

Given this, i think the (6d) entity would still need to perform some actions that make up for the previous actions caused.

if we look at what Ra says, this wont seem to be necessary, since multiple simultaneous existences will balance the overall

however, i think that, even what the individual nodes of an entity did, will have to get balanced eventually, in other octaves, if not in this octave.

because, even if you take the mind/body/spirit complex in late 6d as a single entity, the fragments that make up that entity, are still finite entities in themselves. philosophically there is no difference in between a finite, or the other finite. all of them are finites. so, each effect/action initiated by a finite, will eventually need to be balanced.

The way i'm seeing this is that the inner balance/completeness would express itslef in the 'manner of being' but that that 'character' would still be channeled into positively oriented activities. So, serving with grit, absolute determination and focus, etc.

you are still donning positive polarity over unpolarizedness or balancedness.

balance is balance.

You said, "would not do anything that would need balancing", doesnt this assume tha the entity is already balanced and that it's been acting in a 'balanced' (the way you used the word here, this implies mixed polarity, not expressing inner balance (since we are discussing positive/negative actions)) way already? Let me know if i'm mistaken there.

such an entity would either be quite isolated from the existence that goes around it, or, engaging in interactions with entities complementing its own balance. in these actions, nothing would be lost or gained, and interaction would be complete in its own self as much as it could be. in either of these cases, the interactions of this entity would be minimal. isolated in first case, and in the second, only interacting with entities complementing its particular balance, which would be few since entities balanced to great extent are few.

ultimate balance is infinity. even infinite intelligence, is a distortion. when it balances, it becomes infinite. and that becomes totally irrelevant for anything that exists.

So i'm basically saying, how does balance/completeness within the self exempt an entity from making up for its negative/damaging actions?

'completeness within the self' -> no such over-exaggerated thing exists. the self cannot exist without others. these are not two totally isolated, separate concepts. any imbalance that exists, will show itself in the inner world of the entity, and also manifest outside of the entity.

think about infinity -> you cant do anything to it. you cant do anything with it. you cant even reach it. because, being entirely balanced, without distortions, it eludes all kinds of interactions. even infinite intelligence is experiencing infinite octaves since infinity, and yet, it is infinite intelligence.

if you were really 'complete within your self', the existence outside you would also be totally complete, and there would be infinity.

---

An entity, operating in the universe he actively inhabits is still part of the overall scheme of things.. Meaning that there is a goal to this universe that all entities share, so his actions either detract from or support that. What does 'balancing in another universe' mean for his responsibility for his actions in this one..?

multiple infinite universes existing along with this universe, infinite multiple universes in multiple octaves before and after this one, and any other situations and existences throughout infinity that we dont know about, are also part of the overall scheme of things. there is a grouping.

all that matters is, where you draw the line of balance.