I understand that because of the timeless nature of the stars (sub-Logos) and the role they play, that they are not equivalent to beings like Ra who came up similar channels as we ourselves. I had been noticing curious similarities, as stated in my original post, that Ra radiates light, reproduces via fusion, and supposedly does so in stars, and then this most recent clue I read about the idea of higher densities investing in individuals directly below them in density helping them leap forward in evolution, and how the pattern does not continue with 6d investing in 5d, but the Logos investing. Had I been in Don's shoes I would have pursued a line of questioning about this curious connection and kinship I see in pattern between stars and 6d.
Of course, I also would have pursued a line of questioning about how our higher selves are 6d beings and where Ra fits into that. Are they currently serving as higher selves to their past 3d selves? Or are they not yet to that point in their evolution? So many great questions that did not get asked!!
Of course, I also would have pursued a line of questioning about how our higher selves are 6d beings and where Ra fits into that. Are they currently serving as higher selves to their past 3d selves? Or are they not yet to that point in their evolution? So many great questions that did not get asked!!