12-11-2021, 10:34 PM
(12-11-2021, 09:20 AM)tadeus Wrote: What do you think about his statements in the relation to the Law of One?
As I view it, Ra avoids a didactic, how-to approach and simply brings these concepts in from time time as they relate to questions asked. Ra's idea that chakras 1-4 are relational came up recently in another thread and would apply here. What the speaker is describing is the experience of non-relational consciousness, i.e., consciousness experienced as being wholly from within the perceptual field. So, sight is informational input, but the essence of it is what your imagination makes of it. We all know this to some degree, but he's describing a disciplined state of not leaving that posture of regarding all as, if you will, distortions of consciousness.
This is not the case, let's say, on the level of yellow ray consciousness where without other beings there is no experience of social relations. On the red ray level, if there is no external reality, then there is no question of existence or security/insecurity.
I wouldn't call it "beyond oneness" because that term is a bit ambiguous, but "non-relational," which is probably non-comprehensible. Take your pick.
One thing he leaves out is that in order to appreciate that state, the lower energy centers need to be pliable and healthy ("balanced," in the Ra vernacular) or else that expanded state will not be supported by them. It's a bit like piling up different shaped stones one atop the next. Each one needs to be well seated in order to support the added stress of the next level being added.