Intellect

[Diana]

The thing that we all have to be cautious about concerning the "Law of One", is that everybody does not become "Evangelical". No matter what the belief system is, we cannot take something on face value, (without proof). Then you say, it is written, it must be so. Have you seen my posts in the other related subjects, and the, (possible), connection to Peru and the ancient civilizations? We are all investigators here, and at different levels of investigation. I can see parallels when reading the "Book of Ra" to the "Bhagavad-Gita" and other Vedas, (but), we must still look deeper. I am not saying that the Book of Ra is not true, except we still need a certain validation.

I'd like to speak to this, from my personal and current (subject to evolve and change as I take in more awareness) points of view.

Firstly, I will say that proof is not something I seek. However, in the context, I think, of what you are saying, I agree that wisdom would steer an individual toward discernment that derives from their own seeking, and hopefully that seeking doesn't stop in its tracks somewhere and create inertia.

People will follow, they will evangelize, they will hold onto a philosophy or religion, whether that is because they finally found something that resonates, and/or whether they are not yet capable of facing alone the vast mystery that is. There is nothing we can do about that (more on that below). Everyone is where they are at.

Humanity has historically, and still does, collectively seek those who explain the mystery, tell them how to navigate the mystery, and act as a parental figure while they traverse their paths through the labyrinth that is the incredible and incomprehensible universe we find ourselves in, and behind a veil no less. This includes mythical gods of both nature and rulers (this is not to discount the elemental beings of nature but to point out the gods that explained natural occurrences such as an eclipse or storms), gurus, priests and clergy, disincarnate channeled beings, and any being or source perceived as bigger and therefore wiser than us here. This is idea is represented when A. Sphere is telling A. Square about the 3D world (Flatland).

It's a shield against the vastness to believe, to settle on something to hold onto while floating in the mysterious universe—visible and invisible—behind a veil. It's cozy to have a community which believes the same. It's comforting to align in this way with others (and perhaps an unconscious compulsion considering that eventually individuals may align with others in a SMC), under the guidance of a "greater" being or "greater knowledge' that we can't access here easily ourselves. I can understand why people seek this. I can understand the compulsion to "know" rather than to "not know."

I am not like that. I feel a sense of claustrophobia when thinking about believing. I have the feeling that belief is like a wall that requires guarding to maintain itself, therefore it keeps new awarenesses and information from penetrating its perimeter. I think the exceptions to this idea may be the huge, big picture that all is one—unity in fact, as Ra came here to offer. To me this is a universal truth even from the perspective of science that all is connected. Even so, I have working theories only.

But that is me. And, although I hope humanity evolves consciously to a state of greater personal and collective responsibility, so the suffering here can be lessoned and we can heal the planet, it is what it is. Wanderers came here to lighten the planetary vibration:

Ra: I am Ra. The number is approximate due to an heavy influx of those birthed at this time due to an intensive need to lighten the planetary vibration and thus aid in harvest. The number approaches sixty-five million.

So what does a wanderer do the? According to Ra, that is individual:

Ra: I am Ra. . . . Speaking to the intention of your question, the best way for each seeker in third density to be of service to others is unique to that mind/body/spirit complex. This means that the mind/body/spirit complex must then seek within itself the intelligence of its own discernment as to the way it may best serve other-selves. This will be different for each. There is no best. There is no generalization. Nothing is known.

Ra: I am Ra. . . . You may, at this time, note that as with any entities, each Wanderer has its unique abilities, biases, and specialties so that from each portion of each density represented among the Wanderers comes an array of pre-incarnative talents which then may be expressed upon this plane which you now experience so that each Wanderer, in offering itself before incarnation, has some special service to offer in addition to the doubling effect of planetary love and light and the basic function of serving as beacon or shepherd.

Thus there are those of fifth density whose abilities to express wisdom are great. There are fourth- and sixth-density Wanderers whose ability to serve as, shall we say, passive radiators or broadcasters of love and love/light are immense. There are many others whose talents brought into this density are quite varied.

Though wanderers here may already be functioning as a beacon of planetary love and light, those of Ra also point out the importance of individual expression.

I personally don't find, and haven't found in my life, any efficacy in deconstructing anyone's beliefs. (That is not to say I don't love philosophizing and discussing these great topics.) I have the add-in philosophy. I add in my particular self to the mix. My experience indicates that that is the most I can do.