10-27-2010, 10:58 AM
unity100 Wrote:it doesnt get into the heart of what im proposing. everything is either ok, or not ok.
if you say 'higher self etcetc', than that means everything is not ok, because there is the 'higher self' etc etc.
if, everything is 'ok', it doesnt matter what someone does, and that includes going against one's higher self or etc.
Why do you insist that everything is either ok, or not ok? Do you understand what I wrote about humanity currently being in a state of duality? I believe there are more possible viewpoints than the one we hold now with human minds. If you don't believe so, or don't allow that into the discussion, then there's no point in continuing, because we've reached the end of that train of thought.
Is it possible that everything is both ok and not ok in the big picture? Why must it be one way or the other, and if it is one way or the other, what would it prove? Also, what does it have to do with the thread's original topic? (I'll re-read the session and first few posts after I post this, but if you could also answer this question, that would lead to increased clarity, I think.) Maybe you can also state what exactly you are trying to prove, or what point you're defending in the whole "ok or not ok" argument.
I'm trying to better understand where you're coming from so that I can get to the heart of the matter.