I've drawn up another Roots of Unity graphic that focuses on the MTL 2d template of both 1st and 2nd Density which are affected by the weak activation of 3rd Density. Like the other 2 graphics, it only addresses the fundamental 2d level. So there needs to be more R&D of this level and higher dimensional levels to be fully complete.
MTL means Mythos-Topos-Logos and 2d means 2 Dimensional.
Below the graphic 1D, 2D and 3D mean 1st, 2nd and 3rd Density.
![[Image: 8e8de91.png]](https://i.imgsafe.org/8e8de91.png)
When 2D begins on a planet there is also an immediate activation of 3D and seeking by 2D entities towards 3D. It is initially a very weak activation and level of seeking but it does begin to take form as shown by the 3D Yellow Triangle in dotted lines.
In the graphic various "lines of being" cross and intersect to express the MTL 2d template of the Experiencer/Creator dynamic. The Orange 2D line crosses through the midpoint of the Yellow dotted 3D line and reaches the -1 point of the unit circle. This act of beingness is simulated and reproduced by Yellow dotted lines crossing from vertex through midpoint to a point on the circle.
Experiencing and creating takes place, and nexus points of intersection determine polarity potentials for experience and creative action.
Given the activation of 3D, the graphic is about the potentials of evolution in 1D and 2D in terms of rudimentary ethical polarity and the formation of this polarity in the chakra systems of 2D entities. Notice some similarities to the 1st graphic of the chakra system in the previous post.
So the graphic begins to address the following questions.
Are there early rudimentary forms of ethical behavior in 2D? If so how do these forms allow for ethical polarity to emerge from 2D and into 3D?
For example, does the predator/prey behavior in 2D also exist in 3D as abuser/victim behavior?
How about the pecking order structure and pack behavior of wolves that translates to human packs and dominate/submissive behavior?
In ethical polarity terms are these questions.
How does STS/STO emerge from CCS/CCO?
How does DTS/DTO emerge from DCS/DCO?
How does NTS/NTO emerge from NCS/NCO?
CCS/CCO is care concern for self/other.
DCS/DCO is discare disconcern for self/other.
NCS/NCO is noncare nonconcern for self/other.
I would actually begin 1D and early 2D with Polarity terms of inner/outer focus or IF/OF and of inner/outer care concern or ICC/OCC because the self/other dynamic has not yet emerged to any significant level. People with Pet Rocks or their favorite crystal may think differently but that may be because of their 3D investment and infusion to enable rudimentary selfhood.
Even though there is very little selfhood at 1D and early 2D of a planet there are the dynamics of focus/disfocus and care/discare and concern/disconcern in the form of constructive/destructive and order/disorder. These dynamics of a 1D and early 2D planet prepare the way for the later evolved ethical dynamics.
Very briefly, in 2D we see biological interactions and relationships that show ethical polarity and can be listed as the following.
Symbiosis or Mutualism -- a two-way STO/STS where they benefit themselves and each other in a type of cooperation.
Antagonism or Parasitism -- a one-way STS/DTO where one gains while the other loses.
Mutual Antagonism or Competition -- a two-way STS/DTO of aggressive dominant behavior.
Commensalism -- a one-way STS/NTO ie remora/shark in which one benefits and the other is neither benefited nor harmed
Altruism -- a one-way STO/DTS of the bee or wildebeest that sacrifices itself to protect the colony or herd's young from the invader/predator
The polarity values from the graphic may be reflecting the quantitative thresholds that determine these various types of interaction occurring both between species and within species ie +.866 as Altruism and -.866 as Parasitism.
And of course there is also the mating and child nurturing behaviors that reflect chakra level polarity of the ROY triad where survival and perpetuation of the species involves some self/other dynamics.
So to conclude, there is MTL complexity occurring on a 1D and early 2D planet that provides for a future 3D with its rudiments of ethical polarity. Some aspects of this is touched on in the thread of Uranus and Neptune.
Life emerging on Uranus and Neptune
http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=11530
Ethical Polarity is still based on Yang/Yin or AO + OA or IU + UI of the Dialectical Monism that emerges from the non-dual Existence Monism.
The next post may jump back to the OP and dive into the ethical and psychological disorders that take place and which seems to wreak havoc with some Wanderers. I'll try to involve some 3D and 4D AstroPsychology to address that topic.
MTL means Mythos-Topos-Logos and 2d means 2 Dimensional.
Below the graphic 1D, 2D and 3D mean 1st, 2nd and 3rd Density.
When 2D begins on a planet there is also an immediate activation of 3D and seeking by 2D entities towards 3D. It is initially a very weak activation and level of seeking but it does begin to take form as shown by the 3D Yellow Triangle in dotted lines.
In the graphic various "lines of being" cross and intersect to express the MTL 2d template of the Experiencer/Creator dynamic. The Orange 2D line crosses through the midpoint of the Yellow dotted 3D line and reaches the -1 point of the unit circle. This act of beingness is simulated and reproduced by Yellow dotted lines crossing from vertex through midpoint to a point on the circle.
Experiencing and creating takes place, and nexus points of intersection determine polarity potentials for experience and creative action.
Given the activation of 3D, the graphic is about the potentials of evolution in 1D and 2D in terms of rudimentary ethical polarity and the formation of this polarity in the chakra systems of 2D entities. Notice some similarities to the 1st graphic of the chakra system in the previous post.
So the graphic begins to address the following questions.
Are there early rudimentary forms of ethical behavior in 2D? If so how do these forms allow for ethical polarity to emerge from 2D and into 3D?
For example, does the predator/prey behavior in 2D also exist in 3D as abuser/victim behavior?
How about the pecking order structure and pack behavior of wolves that translates to human packs and dominate/submissive behavior?
In ethical polarity terms are these questions.
How does STS/STO emerge from CCS/CCO?
How does DTS/DTO emerge from DCS/DCO?
How does NTS/NTO emerge from NCS/NCO?
CCS/CCO is care concern for self/other.
DCS/DCO is discare disconcern for self/other.
NCS/NCO is noncare nonconcern for self/other.
I would actually begin 1D and early 2D with Polarity terms of inner/outer focus or IF/OF and of inner/outer care concern or ICC/OCC because the self/other dynamic has not yet emerged to any significant level. People with Pet Rocks or their favorite crystal may think differently but that may be because of their 3D investment and infusion to enable rudimentary selfhood.
Even though there is very little selfhood at 1D and early 2D of a planet there are the dynamics of focus/disfocus and care/discare and concern/disconcern in the form of constructive/destructive and order/disorder. These dynamics of a 1D and early 2D planet prepare the way for the later evolved ethical dynamics.
Very briefly, in 2D we see biological interactions and relationships that show ethical polarity and can be listed as the following.
Symbiosis or Mutualism -- a two-way STO/STS where they benefit themselves and each other in a type of cooperation.
Antagonism or Parasitism -- a one-way STS/DTO where one gains while the other loses.
Mutual Antagonism or Competition -- a two-way STS/DTO of aggressive dominant behavior.
Commensalism -- a one-way STS/NTO ie remora/shark in which one benefits and the other is neither benefited nor harmed
Altruism -- a one-way STO/DTS of the bee or wildebeest that sacrifices itself to protect the colony or herd's young from the invader/predator
The polarity values from the graphic may be reflecting the quantitative thresholds that determine these various types of interaction occurring both between species and within species ie +.866 as Altruism and -.866 as Parasitism.
And of course there is also the mating and child nurturing behaviors that reflect chakra level polarity of the ROY triad where survival and perpetuation of the species involves some self/other dynamics.
So to conclude, there is MTL complexity occurring on a 1D and early 2D planet that provides for a future 3D with its rudiments of ethical polarity. Some aspects of this is touched on in the thread of Uranus and Neptune.
Life emerging on Uranus and Neptune
http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=11530
Ethical Polarity is still based on Yang/Yin or AO + OA or IU + UI of the Dialectical Monism that emerges from the non-dual Existence Monism.
The next post may jump back to the OP and dive into the ethical and psychological disorders that take place and which seems to wreak havoc with some Wanderers. I'll try to involve some 3D and 4D AstroPsychology to address that topic.