02-07-2016, 02:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-07-2016, 04:55 PM by 4Dsunrise.
Edit Reason: (3/3), (4/4), (5/5) points refer to 2nd graphic
)
Here's a graphic of a model based on Roots of Unity theory, metamathematics and metaphysics. The square root of 3, or more accurately, 2nd root of 3, represents "bipolar 3-ness" generated initially by the 3rd root of Unity which constructs the large triangle with a vertex at the right origin.
Note: ccs/cco is care concern for self/other derived from 1D and 2D and precedes sts/sto in 3D.
The 3-ness is metaphysical in the form of 3-fold MTL complex and MBS complex emergence in 3rd Density, and with 3rd Dimensional (actually bipolar 3d as space/time and time/space) means of expression.
The chakra lines of force and centers are clearly seen as natural triadic constructions of internal balance and symmetry that have dynamism. It is the minimal MTL 2d template which can be expanded to 3d and beyond. So it is fundamental, yet lacks detail to be R&D'd.
![[Image: a0a86eb.png]](https://i.imgsafe.org/a0a86eb.png)
In all fairness ETM's and Plenum's thoughts here are somewhat dated to May of 2015 so presently they may have done further contemplation and have revised them. So a caveat is in order here.
Austin asks
ETM says
This makes sense when considering the self-focus of both 1D and 2D beingness which is the foundation for 3D. 1D beingness involves survival, sustainability and evolution towards 2D of a new formed planet. 2D beingness involves survival, sustainablity and evolution towards self-aware 3D of many 2D species.
There is both a qualitative and quantitative emphasis of self-focus, self-concern and self-awareness as shown by the ROY triad of chakras in which Red is personal 86.6% ccs, Orange is interpersonal 57.7% ccs with an evolutionary jump to Yellow as transpersonal 28.8% ccs and 71.2% cco which is initially a raw and relatively shallow expression of cco to barely enable the graduation to 3D self-awareness as an ethical being.
The multi-variable qualitative aspects temper the quantitative % aspects in complex ways which results in a complex psychology of affective and cognitive expressions in 2D and 3D species.
Examples of raw Yellow expression is the instinctive altruistic behavior of bees and ants that die to protect their colony, the salmon that swim upstream to spawn and die for their species, the herd of antelope that circle young members to protect them from the predator lions to save and perpetuate their species.
The colony, herd, tribe etc are raw cco extensions of self which we see in our 3D of street gangs, religious sects, national, ethnic and racial groups, etc. There is self-awareness and Yellow 71.2% cco in an emerging transpersonal or group based level.
Overall the ROY triad is 173.1 ccs and 126.9 cco -- a large quantitative difference for an emerging 3D entity and which supports ETM's point about relative ease of self-focus.
Plenum says
The only issue is -- what about the unpolarized entites which are the majority. They are in the sinkhole of indifference as neither positive or negative? Which process is used -- the violet spectrum or ROY analysis? It probably depends on whether an entity is leaning positive or negative and for negative it needs to be towards 70% STS -- I would presume.
The measuring process doesn't actually address the "difficulty" question but may be useful to describe the dynamics of the above model.
Plenum says
This complies with AOP = AO + OA or the Dialectical Monism of the Tao.
The more interesting is the converse where 95% STS is absorbing at an overwhelming and extreme degree to the extent of "sucking the life force" out of those around oneself. One would be similar to an energy vacuum suction device whose effect others would immediately sense in the form of feeling drained or disoriented in one's presence.
These are fun people to be around! From a distance perhaps? Or if you are in 6D merger mode and require some melding with the most evolved -6D beings then have at it!
Examples are the cult leader, black magician or guru who reduce his/her followers to mind-controlled minions who give their power away via worship and fear. But these esoteric and occult types are negative Wanderer beings who have already graduated to 4D and above.
What about the less sophisticated 3D being who is experiencing this 95% absorption for the first time and needs to maintain it to graduate to 4D? These types would have to be less esoteric and more exoteric. The celebrities and their puppet masters ie directors and producers. Or the politicians and their puppet masters ie investment bankers and corporate CEOs. The drug kingpins, the human traffic kingpins, the religious warlords -- all who need to reach and maintain the level of domination of a Genghis Khan.
According Scott Mandelker, some of these are of the so-called Illuminati who ally with 4D Orion types.
So they do dabble in occult and probably sexual and psychological dominance practices, but are raw and unpolished to some extent and many do not make the 95% cut due to lack of discipline and self-balance. They aren't pure STS/STO but degenerate to some degree of unfocused DTS/DTO or NTS/NTO intention and behavior in the sinkhole of ethical volatility.
There's much more to discuss and question regarding this model so please inquire.
------------------------
The next graphic is a simplified model which leaves out 1D, 2D, 6D, 7D and 8D because it would be a complex web of lines to decipher the implications of the whole Octave in such a minimal space. The (3/3), (4/4), (5/5) points all start at right origin but were not labeled on graph so as to minimize potential confusion.
![[Image: 0ad7378.png]](https://i.imgsafe.org/0ad7378.png)
-------------
If I were to put in 1D and 2D lines, 1D would relate to emergence of the absolute value of unity and the seed for the circular and cyclic nature of existence -- thus generating the unit circle.
2D would relate to emergence of the relative bipolar values (-1 and +1) to provide the bi-circle nature with the intersecting vessica pisces that is the seed template of the chakra system and perhaps other complex systems.
Besides the 50% and 95% intersections there are many other lines of intersection that may have secondary effects in the analysis of ethical dynamics that reflect evolutionary sub-stages. The natural balance of the polarity scale reflects the balance of AO + OA or the Tao's Yin and Yang respectively.
Btw, I think the Ra group appropriately used 51% and 95% as natural simplified threshold values by rounding up from say 50.3% or rounding down from 95.1%. This means that 50.3% can graduate.
The Polarity Scale has more complexity which involves using a unit shift to observe the ideal value of STO/STS. As you shift up from +.50 you also shift up from -.50 to get for example +.55/-.45. They shift as a unit which reflects the idealistic state of STO/STS.
But this idealistic state is simplistic and not real life ethical dynamics b/c DTS/DTO and NTS/NTO need to be factored in. To clearly illustrate, and not to be harsh, do you think Carla and Don were pure STO/STS in their ethical dynamics? Do you think self-deprecation or commiting suicide is STO or STS? More like DTS in both their cases which can destabilize their STO focus and leave them open to STS influence.
We all have these issues to some degree ie the example of the unstable and volatile Wanderer in the OP of this thread.
So an example of the ethical dynamics of someone would be the following -- 60% STO, 25% STS, 10% DTS, 3% DTO, 1% NTS, 1% NTO -- plus ethical range and volatility which causes these statistical values to be somewhat fluid. These statistical values thus provide a multi-dimensional model that better reflects real life and real world situations.
That's partly the description of the Polarity Scale complexity where the "service" of STS or STO, has the effect of gaining polarity in a direct manner, whereas the "disservice" of DTS or DTO has the effect of losing polarity in an indirect manner. The gain/lose dynamic is bipolar and complies with AO + OA or Tao dynamics.
The AO + OA or Tao dynamics is also shown in the Polarity Scale and in the graphical "density interaction" in the following way.
On the graph both (1/5) and (4/5) indicate the bipolar nature of +95 and -95 whereby (1/5) may address the OA/Yang intention of 1st density and the (4/5) may address the AO/Yin intention of 4th density -- both from a 5th density frame of reference and perspective.
The (4/5) also relates to how negative 4D graduation involves the strong ROY plus a strong Blue chakra which strives for 5D and with an absolute minimal Green. The ideal for a negative striving person is ROYB which sums to 245.3 ccs and 147.7 cco and which provides potential for - 95% polarization if the will and focus is strong. Of course this is theory and open to question.
Also, not labeled on the graphic due to space constraints is the 3D Yellow Triangle which has (1/3) as 1st density intention at +86.6 while (2/3) is 2nd density intention at -86.6 which expresses the OA + AO or Yang/Yin respectively and is the template for the ethical levels of the chakra system as shown in the first graphic of this post.
To reiterate, (1/3) is the OA/Yang of outward emergence in 1D while (2/3) is the AO/Yin of inward convergence in 2D to then go back to (3/3) or 3rd density intention to a neutral, yet dynamic, 0 state that provides self-awareness and completes the 3D intention cycle.
This is all up for question and much R&D so hopefully there's some feedback besides from the crickets as Gary so artfully mentioned. Kudos to Gary for that "cunning retort" that actually cuts both ways -- referring to forum readers as crickets or these posts only worthy of cricket responses?
In both cases "how dare you!" as former CNN host Piers Morgan famously says to guests that disagree with him. Just kidding -- and cunning retorts are welcome esp if they address the topic here.
Note: ccs/cco is care concern for self/other derived from 1D and 2D and precedes sts/sto in 3D.
The 3-ness is metaphysical in the form of 3-fold MTL complex and MBS complex emergence in 3rd Density, and with 3rd Dimensional (actually bipolar 3d as space/time and time/space) means of expression.
The chakra lines of force and centers are clearly seen as natural triadic constructions of internal balance and symmetry that have dynamism. It is the minimal MTL 2d template which can be expanded to 3d and beyond. So it is fundamental, yet lacks detail to be R&D'd.
In all fairness ETM's and Plenum's thoughts here are somewhat dated to May of 2015 so presently they may have done further contemplation and have revised them. So a caveat is in order here.
Austin asks
Quote:Is it really "as difficult"? It seems to me that the dedication required for service to self harvestability is more difficult, and Ra indicates elsewhere in the material that our sub-Logos is skewed towards the positive. How is it just as difficult? Why does Ra say this?
ETM says
Quote:It is as difficult. The reason between the large difference is that in awareness you are self and not other-selves and as such there is more probability for self to generate effort for the self. You truly feel hunger through your hunger, etc.. [In 3D awareness] To be 51% STO means that you will [constantly] balance to put others [ever so slightly] above you, and that is hard as you are self and not other-selves in your awareness of things.
This makes sense when considering the self-focus of both 1D and 2D beingness which is the foundation for 3D. 1D beingness involves survival, sustainability and evolution towards 2D of a new formed planet. 2D beingness involves survival, sustainablity and evolution towards self-aware 3D of many 2D species.
There is both a qualitative and quantitative emphasis of self-focus, self-concern and self-awareness as shown by the ROY triad of chakras in which Red is personal 86.6% ccs, Orange is interpersonal 57.7% ccs with an evolutionary jump to Yellow as transpersonal 28.8% ccs and 71.2% cco which is initially a raw and relatively shallow expression of cco to barely enable the graduation to 3D self-awareness as an ethical being.
The multi-variable qualitative aspects temper the quantitative % aspects in complex ways which results in a complex psychology of affective and cognitive expressions in 2D and 3D species.
Examples of raw Yellow expression is the instinctive altruistic behavior of bees and ants that die to protect their colony, the salmon that swim upstream to spawn and die for their species, the herd of antelope that circle young members to protect them from the predator lions to save and perpetuate their species.
The colony, herd, tribe etc are raw cco extensions of self which we see in our 3D of street gangs, religious sects, national, ethnic and racial groups, etc. There is self-awareness and Yellow 71.2% cco in an emerging transpersonal or group based level.
Overall the ROY triad is 173.1 ccs and 126.9 cco -- a large quantitative difference for an emerging 3D entity and which supports ETM's point about relative ease of self-focus.
Plenum says
Quote:in terms of energetics, a positive entity is weighed on their violet ray spectrum (overall balance), with a specific interest in the primary energy centres (chakras 1, 3, and 5).
a negative entity is examined for their orange and yellow ray energy centres, which correspond to being able to enforce control, respectively, over the self (orange ray) and other-selves (yellow ray).
The only issue is -- what about the unpolarized entites which are the majority. They are in the sinkhole of indifference as neither positive or negative? Which process is used -- the violet spectrum or ROY analysis? It probably depends on whether an entity is leaning positive or negative and for negative it needs to be towards 70% STS -- I would presume.
The measuring process doesn't actually address the "difficulty" question but may be useful to describe the dynamics of the above model.
Plenum says
Quote:what does 51% correlate to? I would say that in terms of energy, one is radiating more than one is absorbing
This complies with AOP = AO + OA or the Dialectical Monism of the Tao.
The more interesting is the converse where 95% STS is absorbing at an overwhelming and extreme degree to the extent of "sucking the life force" out of those around oneself. One would be similar to an energy vacuum suction device whose effect others would immediately sense in the form of feeling drained or disoriented in one's presence.
These are fun people to be around! From a distance perhaps? Or if you are in 6D merger mode and require some melding with the most evolved -6D beings then have at it!
Examples are the cult leader, black magician or guru who reduce his/her followers to mind-controlled minions who give their power away via worship and fear. But these esoteric and occult types are negative Wanderer beings who have already graduated to 4D and above.
What about the less sophisticated 3D being who is experiencing this 95% absorption for the first time and needs to maintain it to graduate to 4D? These types would have to be less esoteric and more exoteric. The celebrities and their puppet masters ie directors and producers. Or the politicians and their puppet masters ie investment bankers and corporate CEOs. The drug kingpins, the human traffic kingpins, the religious warlords -- all who need to reach and maintain the level of domination of a Genghis Khan.
According Scott Mandelker, some of these are of the so-called Illuminati who ally with 4D Orion types.
So they do dabble in occult and probably sexual and psychological dominance practices, but are raw and unpolished to some extent and many do not make the 95% cut due to lack of discipline and self-balance. They aren't pure STS/STO but degenerate to some degree of unfocused DTS/DTO or NTS/NTO intention and behavior in the sinkhole of ethical volatility.
There's much more to discuss and question regarding this model so please inquire.
------------------------
The next graphic is a simplified model which leaves out 1D, 2D, 6D, 7D and 8D because it would be a complex web of lines to decipher the implications of the whole Octave in such a minimal space. The (3/3), (4/4), (5/5) points all start at right origin but were not labeled on graph so as to minimize potential confusion.
-------------
If I were to put in 1D and 2D lines, 1D would relate to emergence of the absolute value of unity and the seed for the circular and cyclic nature of existence -- thus generating the unit circle.
2D would relate to emergence of the relative bipolar values (-1 and +1) to provide the bi-circle nature with the intersecting vessica pisces that is the seed template of the chakra system and perhaps other complex systems.
Besides the 50% and 95% intersections there are many other lines of intersection that may have secondary effects in the analysis of ethical dynamics that reflect evolutionary sub-stages. The natural balance of the polarity scale reflects the balance of AO + OA or the Tao's Yin and Yang respectively.
Btw, I think the Ra group appropriately used 51% and 95% as natural simplified threshold values by rounding up from say 50.3% or rounding down from 95.1%. This means that 50.3% can graduate.
The Polarity Scale has more complexity which involves using a unit shift to observe the ideal value of STO/STS. As you shift up from +.50 you also shift up from -.50 to get for example +.55/-.45. They shift as a unit which reflects the idealistic state of STO/STS.
But this idealistic state is simplistic and not real life ethical dynamics b/c DTS/DTO and NTS/NTO need to be factored in. To clearly illustrate, and not to be harsh, do you think Carla and Don were pure STO/STS in their ethical dynamics? Do you think self-deprecation or commiting suicide is STO or STS? More like DTS in both their cases which can destabilize their STO focus and leave them open to STS influence.
We all have these issues to some degree ie the example of the unstable and volatile Wanderer in the OP of this thread.
So an example of the ethical dynamics of someone would be the following -- 60% STO, 25% STS, 10% DTS, 3% DTO, 1% NTS, 1% NTO -- plus ethical range and volatility which causes these statistical values to be somewhat fluid. These statistical values thus provide a multi-dimensional model that better reflects real life and real world situations.
That's partly the description of the Polarity Scale complexity where the "service" of STS or STO, has the effect of gaining polarity in a direct manner, whereas the "disservice" of DTS or DTO has the effect of losing polarity in an indirect manner. The gain/lose dynamic is bipolar and complies with AO + OA or Tao dynamics.
The AO + OA or Tao dynamics is also shown in the Polarity Scale and in the graphical "density interaction" in the following way.
On the graph both (1/5) and (4/5) indicate the bipolar nature of +95 and -95 whereby (1/5) may address the OA/Yang intention of 1st density and the (4/5) may address the AO/Yin intention of 4th density -- both from a 5th density frame of reference and perspective.
The (4/5) also relates to how negative 4D graduation involves the strong ROY plus a strong Blue chakra which strives for 5D and with an absolute minimal Green. The ideal for a negative striving person is ROYB which sums to 245.3 ccs and 147.7 cco and which provides potential for - 95% polarization if the will and focus is strong. Of course this is theory and open to question.
Also, not labeled on the graphic due to space constraints is the 3D Yellow Triangle which has (1/3) as 1st density intention at +86.6 while (2/3) is 2nd density intention at -86.6 which expresses the OA + AO or Yang/Yin respectively and is the template for the ethical levels of the chakra system as shown in the first graphic of this post.
To reiterate, (1/3) is the OA/Yang of outward emergence in 1D while (2/3) is the AO/Yin of inward convergence in 2D to then go back to (3/3) or 3rd density intention to a neutral, yet dynamic, 0 state that provides self-awareness and completes the 3D intention cycle.
This is all up for question and much R&D so hopefully there's some feedback besides from the crickets as Gary so artfully mentioned. Kudos to Gary for that "cunning retort" that actually cuts both ways -- referring to forum readers as crickets or these posts only worthy of cricket responses?
In both cases "how dare you!" as former CNN host Piers Morgan famously says to guests that disagree with him. Just kidding -- and cunning retorts are welcome esp if they address the topic here.