05-29-2014, 12:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2014, 12:08 PM by Adonai One.)
(05-29-2014, 08:01 AM)ScottK Wrote:(05-29-2014, 03:32 AM)Adonai One Wrote: According to the Ra material, there are two choices and they are mirrored in the choices above: Acceptance and rejection.
Please show me something to back this statement up.
In a mixed polarity 3d world, if those of positive polarity accepted all things, they merely become "spiritual punching bags" of the negative polarity, and the world destroys itself or becomes a very dark place.
Speaking for myself, I reject the limitation of free will - the acts by which one entity limits the free will of another entity.
On Edit:
(05-29-2014, 03:32 AM)Ra Wrote: 25.6 Questioner: Could you amplify the meaning of what you said by “failure to accept that which is given?”
Ra: I am Ra. At the level of time/space at which this takes place in the form of what you may call thought-war, the most accepting and loving energy would be to so love those who wished to manipulate that those entities were surrounded, engulfed, and transformed by positive energies.
This, however, being a battle of equals, the Confederation is aware that it cannot, on equal footing, allow itself to be manipulated in order to remain purely positive, for then though pure it would not be of any consequence, having been placed by the so-called powers of darkness under the heel, as you may say.
It is thus that those who deal with this thought-war must be defensive rather than accepting in order to preserve their usefulness in service to others. Thusly, they cannot accept fully what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, that being enslavement. Thusly, some polarity is lost due to this friction and both sides, if you will, must then regroup.
It has not been fruitful for either side. The only consequence which has been helpful is a balancing of the energies available to this planet so that these energies have less necessity to be balanced in this space/time, thus lessening the chances of planetary annihilation.
I will attempt to resolve this with a simple question:
Is not acceptance of all things an acceptance of one's desires and the desire of others in unison?